The role of religion in the debate about physician-assisted dying

被引:13
作者
Stempsey, William E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll Holy Cross, Dept Philosophy, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
关键词
End-of-life issues; Euthanasia; Physician-assisted suicide; Public policy; Religion;
D O I
10.1007/s11019-010-9267-y
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores the role of religious belief in public debate about physician-assisted dying and argues that the role is essential because any discussion about the way we die raises the deepest questions about the meaning of human life and death. For religious people, such questions are essentially religious ones, even when the religious elements are framed in secular political or philosophical language. The paper begins by reviewing some of the empirical data about religious belief and practice in the United States and Europe. It then explores the question of the proper role of religion in public policy debate and concludes with a discussion of the importance of religion and religious practices in considerations of how we die.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 387
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, POLITICAL LIBERALISM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, US RELIG LANDSCAPE S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 2014 US REL LANDSC S
[5]  
Charbonnier R., 2008, CHRISTIAN BIOETHICS, V14, P95
[6]  
Chelini-Pont Blandine., 2005, Brigham Young University law review, P611
[7]  
Dworkin R, 1997, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V44, P41
[8]   How secular is Europe? [J].
Halman, L ;
Draulans, V .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (02) :263-288
[9]  
KING DE, 1994, J FAM PRACTICE, V39, P349
[10]   The idea of public reason revisited [J].
Rawls, J .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 1997, 64 (03) :765-807