A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials

被引:120
|
作者
Aparicio, Luana V. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guarienti, Fabiana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Razza, Lais Boralli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Carvalho, Andre F. [4 ,5 ]
Fregni, Felipe [6 ]
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Univ Hosp, Ctr Clin & Epidemiol Res, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Univ Hosp, Interdisciplinary Ctr Appl Neuromodulat CINA, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Serv Interdisciplinary Neuromodulat, Dept & Inst Psychiat, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Ceara, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Ceara, Fac Med, Translat Psychiat Res Grp, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[6] Harvard Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Ctr Clin Res Learning, Lab Neuromodulat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[7] Univ Sao Paulo, Lab Neurosci LIM27, Dept & Inst Psychiat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; Meta-analysis; Acceptability; Tolerability; Adverse effects; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; SHAM-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; MOTOR RECOVERY; CHRONIC STROKE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; CORTEX MODULATION; MAJOR DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation investigated as a treatment for several neuropsychiatric disorders. Notwithstanding tDCS-induced adverse events (AEs) are considered to be low and transient, systematic review analyses on safety and tolerability of tDCS derive mostly from single-session studies. Objective: To investigate the tolerability (rate of AEs) and acceptability (rate of dropouts) of tDCS. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of tDCS randomized, sham-controlled trials in healthy or neuropsychiatric adult samples from the first date available to March 9, 2016. We only included parallel studies performing at least 5 tDCS sessions. An adapted version of CONSORT guidelines for reporting harms outcomes was used to evaluate AE reporting. Results: Sixty-four studies (2262 participants) were included. They had a low risk of publication bias and methodological bias for the items assessed. Dropout rates in active and sham tDCS groups were, respectively, 6% and 7.2% (OR = 0.82 [0.59-1.14]). However, almost half of studies reported no dropouts and only 23.4% reported its reasons; when reported, the most frequent reasons were AEs and protocol violation. A tolerability meta-analysis was not performed, as most studies did not report AEs. The quality of AEs reporting was also limited, particularly in smaller studies and stroke studies. Conclusions: Although overall dropout rate was low and similar in active and sham groups, studies did not adequately describe AEs. An updated questionnaire and guidelines for assessment of AEs in tDCS trials are proposed in order to standardize the reporting of AE in the field. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 681
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric neuropsychiatry: safety, tolerability, acceptability.
    Buchanan, Derrick Matthew
    D'Angiulli, Amedeo
    Samson, Andre
    Robaey, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 44 (05): : S9 - S10
  • [2] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Addictions: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
    Yadollahpour, Ali
    Yuan, Tifei
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REVIEWS, 2018, 14 (04) : 221 - 229
  • [3] Systematic Review on the Safety and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children and Adolescents
    Buchanan, Derrick Matthew
    Bogdanowicz, Thomas
    Khanna, Neha
    Lockman-Dufour, Guillaume
    Robaey, Philippe
    D'Angiulli, Amedeo
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (02) : 1 - 21
  • [4] Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review
    Deus-Yela, Joan
    Dolors Soler, M.
    Pelayo-Vergara, Raul
    Vidal-Samso, Joan
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2017, 65 (08) : 353 - 360
  • [5] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability
    Meron, Daniel
    Hedger, Nicholas
    Garner, Matthew
    Baldwin, David S.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2015, 57 : 46 - 62
  • [6] Transcranial direct current stimulation for auditory verbal hallucinations: a systematic review of clinical trials
    Rashidi, Samaneh
    Jones, Myles
    Murillo-Rodriguez, Eric
    Machado, Sergio
    Hao, Youguo
    Yadollahpour, Ali
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (04) : 666 - 671
  • [7] Transcranial direct current stimulation for auditory verbal hallucinations:a systematic review of clinical trials
    Samaneh Rashidi
    Myles Jones
    Eric Murillo-Rodriguez
    Sergio Machado
    Youguo Hao
    Ali Yadollahpour
    NeuralRegenerationResearch, 2021, 16 (04) : 666 - 671
  • [8] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in focal hand dystonia: Systematic review of intervention trials
    Menon, Vikas
    Varadharajan, Natarajan
    Bascarane, Sharmi
    Andrade, Chittaranjan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 80
  • [9] Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of tinnitus: a review of clinical trials and mechanisms of action
    Tifei Yuan
    Ali Yadollahpour
    Julio Salgado-Ramírez
    Daniel Robles-Camarillo
    Rocío Ortega-Palacios
    BMC Neuroscience, 19
  • [10] Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of tinnitus: a review of clinical trials and mechanisms of action
    Yuan, Tifei
    Yadollahpour, Ali
    Salgado-Ramirez, Julio
    Robles-Camarillo, Daniel
    Ortega-Palacios, Rocio
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 19