Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique

被引:10
作者
Kim, Seong Hwan [1 ]
Park, Yong-Beom [2 ]
Kim, Dong-Hyun [2 ]
Pujol, Nicolas [3 ]
Lee, Han-Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Hyundae Gen Hosp, Namyangju Si, Kyunggi Do, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Coll Med, 102 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06973, South Korea
[3] Ctr Hosp Versailles, Dept Orthoped, Le Chesnay, France
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Trans-tibial technique; Failure; Risk factor; ANTEROLATERAL LIGAMENT; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL POSITION; FOLLOW-UP; KNEE; GRAFT; STABILITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; MENISCECTOMY; REMNANT;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-020-03483-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Factors for graft failure after trans-tibial (TT) ACL reconstruction, including anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury and degree of synovialization, remain unclear. This study is to evaluate the risk factors for graft failures after TT ACL reconstruction including ALL injury and synovialization. Materials and methods A total 391 patients who underwent primary TT ACL reconstruction were included. Failure was defined as greater than grade 2 laxity on the Lachman or pivot shift tests or 5 mm of anterior translation on stress radiograph. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 31 patients with failure were categorized as group 1 and 89 patients without failure were categorized as group 2. Chi-square test and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. Results Preoperatively, 64 patients had ALL injuries (53.3%), 58 had medial meniscal (MM) tears (48.3%), and 62 had lateral meniscal (LM) tears (51.6%). Ninety-three patients (77.5%) had acute injuries and 27 had chronic injuries as per 6-weeks duration. Significant risk factors for failure were LM tear (hazard ratio [HR], 4.018; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.677-9.629;p = 0.002), chronicity (HR, 6.812; 95% CI 2.758-16.824;p = 0.000), presence of ALL injury (HR, 3.655; 95% CI 1.442-9.265;p = 0.006), and poor synovialization (HR, 3.134; 95% CI 1.298-7.566;p = 0.011) in Cox proportional hazard analysis. If combined MM and LM tears were found, an increased risk of failure was also identified (combined tears: HR, 3.951; 95% CI 1.754-8.901;p = 0.001/preoperative high-grade laxity: HR, 4.546; 95% CI 1.875-11.02;p = 0.001). Conclusion Chronic ACL injuries, meniscus tear, preoperative ALL injuries, preoperative high-grade laxity and poor synovialization are significant risk factors. Therefore, these factors should be carefully assessed and properly treated in TT ACL reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1457
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Factors Affecting the Extent of Graft Tendon Synovialization after Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Based on Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings
    Ahn, Gil Yeong
    Nam, Il Hyun
    Lee, Yeong Hyeon
    Lee, Yong Sik
    Choi, Young Duk
    Lee, Hee Hyung
    Hwang, Sung Hyun
    [J]. CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (04) : 413 - 419
  • [2] Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
    Arno, Sally
    Bell, Christopher P.
    Alaia, Michael J.
    Singh, Brian C.
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    Walker, Peter S.
    Bansal, Ankit
    Garofolo, Garret
    Sherman, Orrin H.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (07) : 1679 - 1689
  • [3] Anterior knee laxity measurement: Comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos® and "Lerat", and GNRB® arthrometer
    Beldame, J.
    Mouchel, S.
    Bertiaux, S.
    Adam, J. -M.
    Mouilhade, F.
    Roussignol, X.
    Dujardin, F.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2012, 98 (07) : 744 - 750
  • [4] Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears
    Beldame, J.
    Bertiaux, S.
    Roussignol, X.
    Lefebvre, B.
    Adam, J. -M.
    Mouilhade, F.
    Dujardin, F.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2011, 97 (01) : 34 - 43
  • [5] Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tunnel Position and Graft Obliquity With Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Femoral Tunnel Reaming Techniques Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bowers, Andrea L.
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Lipman, Joseph D.
    Potter, Hollis G.
    Rodeo, Scott A.
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    Warren, Russell F.
    Altchek, David W.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (11) : 1511 - 1522
  • [6] A cadaveric study of the anterolateral ligament: re-introducing the lateral capsular ligament
    Caterine, Scott
    Litchfield, Robert
    Johnson, Marjorie
    Chronik, Blaine
    Getgood, Alan
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (11) : 3186 - 3195
  • [7] The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years
    Chambat, Pierre
    Guier, Christian
    Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
    Fayard, Jean-Marie
    Thaunat, Mathieu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) : 181 - 186
  • [8] A comparison of acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using LARS artificial ligaments: a randomized prospective study with a 5-year follow-up
    Chen, Jia
    Gu, Aiqun
    Jiang, Haitao
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Yu, Xiangrong
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2015, 135 (01) : 95 - 102
  • [9] Does synovialization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a positive effect on functional performance, outcomes scores, stability and muscle strength? A 2-year follow-up study after reconstruction
    Chung, Kyu Sung
    Ha, Jeong Ku
    Ra, Ho Jong
    Kim, Sang Bum
    Lee, Gu Hyun
    Kim, Jin Goo
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (12) : 1725 - 1733
  • [10] Transportal central femoral tunnel placement has a significantly higher revision rate than transtibial AM femoral tunnel placement in hamstring ACL reconstruction
    Clatworthy, Mark
    Sauer, Steffen
    Roberts, Tim
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (01) : 124 - 129