Minority Paradoxes: Ethnic Differences in Self-reported Offending and Official Crime Statistics

被引:6
作者
Leerkes, Arjen [1 ,2 ]
Martinez, Ramiro [3 ,4 ]
Groeneveld, Pim [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Grad Sch Governance, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, NL-6211 LK Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Northeastern Univ, Sch Criminol & Criminal Justice, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Northeastern Univ, Dept Sociol, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
ethnic minorities; self-reported crime; law enforcement; immigration; assimilation; STRAIN THEORY; 2ND-GENERATION; NETHERLANDS; IMMIGRANT; DISCRIMINATION; ASSIMILATION; STATE;
D O I
10.1093/bjc/azy021
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Immigrants and their native-born children tend to be overrepresented among crime suspects in Europe. Using a representative Dutch survey, we examine whether inhabitants of Turkish and Moroccan origin also self-report more crimes than the native Dutch. In addition, we test various explanations for ethnic differences in crime, partly using variables that are unavailable in administrative data (socio-economic status [SES], perceived discrimination, neighbourhood disadvantage and control, family bonds, religiousness). We discover two minority paradoxes. Firstly, contrary to analyses using administrative data, both minorities have similar to lower self-reported crime rates compared to the majority group when age, sex, urbanization, SES and social desirability are controlled. Secondly, first-generation immigrants report fewer crimes than expected given their social disadvantage, thus indicating a notable righteous migrant effect.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 187
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条