Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36mm versus 28mm femoral heads

被引:32
作者
Bistolfi, Alessandro [1 ]
Crova, Maurizio [1 ,2 ]
Rosso, Federica [2 ]
Titolo, Paolo [1 ]
Ventura, Stefano [2 ]
Massazza, Giuseppe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CTO Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Turin, Italy
关键词
Dislocation rate; Large femoral heads; Total hip arthroplasty; SURGICAL APPROACH; REPLACEMENT; SIZE; RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFECTION; DIAMETER; REPAIR; 28-MM; CUP;
D O I
10.5301/HIP.2011.8647
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Dislocation is a common and important complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Larger femoral heads may reduce the risk of dislocation and improve the range of movement. The aim of this study was to compare the relative risk (RR) of dislocation during the first year after THA between implants with 28mm and 36mm femoral heads. 198 consecutive hips with 28mm femoral head (Group-28) and 259 hips with 36mm femoral head (Group-36) were studied. The patients were assessed preoperatively and periodically using the Harris hip score (HHS) and radiographic analysis. The relative risk (RR) of dislocation was calculated. The average HHS significantly improved from a preoperative baseline to the last follow-up at 82.1 months (28mm) and 44.3 months (36mm). No statistically significant differences were revealed between the two groups for HHS results and complications (p > 0.05), but the difference in RR of dislocation within the first year between the two groups was 7.85 (95% CI: 1.34-46.03), p = 0.046. Although dislocation is multifactorial in etiology, the two groups were homogenous for all principal contributing factors except the diameter of the femoral head. Therefore, the use of 36-mm heads can reduce the risk of dislocation following THA by a factor of 8 compared to conventional 28mm heads.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 564
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Barrack Robert L, 2003, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V11, P89
[2]   Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Berry, DJ ;
Von Knoch, M ;
Schleck, CD ;
Harmsen, WS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (11) :2456-2463
[3]   A STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF HIP SCORES [J].
BRYANT, MJ ;
KERNOHAN, WG ;
NIXON, JR ;
MOLLAN, RAB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (05) :705-709
[4]   Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes - An in vitro study [J].
Burroughs, BR ;
Hallstrom, B ;
Golladay, GJ ;
Hoeffel, D ;
Harris, WH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (01) :11-19
[5]   Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation -: A study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register [J].
Byström, S ;
Espehaug, B ;
Furnes, O ;
Havelin, LI .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 74 (05) :514-524
[6]   Role of capsular repair on dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Chivas, A. J. ;
Smith, K. ;
Tanzer, M. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (453) :147-152
[7]   Hip-simulator ranking of polyethylene wear - Comparisons between ceramic heads of different sizes [J].
Clarke, IC ;
Gustafson, A ;
Jung, H ;
Fujisawa, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 67 (02) :128-132
[8]   Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty [J].
Cuckler, JM ;
Moore, KD ;
Lombardi, AV ;
McPherson, E ;
Emerson, R .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (08) :41-44
[9]  
Della Valle C J, 2001, Bull Hosp Jt Dis, V60, P134
[10]  
ENGH CA, 1985, BIOL FIXATION TOTAL, P219