Leadership for learning as an organization-wide practice: evidence on its multilevel structure and implications for educational leadership practice and research

被引:18
作者
Ahn, Joonkil [1 ]
Bowers, Alex J. [2 ]
Welton, Anjale D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Educ Policy Org & Leadership, Urbana, IL USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, Dept Org & Leadership, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Educ Leadership & Policy Anal, Educ Leadership & Policy Anal, Madison, WI USA
关键词
TRANSFORMATIONAL SCHOOL LEADERSHIP; PRINCIPALS INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; VANDERBILT ASSESSMENT; CROSS-VALIDATION; FIT INDEXES; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.1080/13603124.2021.1972162
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Leadership for learning has emerged as a framework that subsumes the core characteristics of instructional leadership, transformational leadership, and distributed leadership. It acknowledges that leadership responsibilities are shared across stakeholders, inviting wider sources of leadership. If leadership for learning conceptualizes leadership as an organization-wide practice beyond that of an individual (e.g. the school principal), its measurement must accordingly invite perceptions and experiences of diverse stakeholders at multiple levels. Focusing solely on principals' or teachers' leadership perceptions is problematic since it fails to capture the unique lived realities teachers or principals experience concerning leadership enactment. It also limits the capacity to examine whether and how these multiple perspectives exert same or divergent impacts on staff development, school culture, and student learning. Thus, this study employed leadership for learning as its theoretical framework and rigorous multilevel factor analysis techniques to examine the extent to which individual teachers, teachers collectively, and principals show distinct perceptions of leadership practices. Four-fold cross-validation multilevel factor analysis revealed conceptual distinctions in how the three entities experience leadership practices distributed across the school. We also present implications for educational leadership research, practices, and policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1351
页数:52
相关论文
共 121 条
[31]  
Fitzgerald T., 2007, AM ED RES ASS C CHIC
[32]  
Ford T., 2018, Education Policy Analysis Archives, V26, P1, DOI DOI 10.14507/EPAA.26.3559
[33]   Validation of Multilevel Constructs: Validation Methods and Empirical Findings for the EDI [J].
Forer, Barry ;
Zumbo, Bruno D. .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2011, 103 (02) :231-265
[34]  
Garcia-Carmona M., 2016, CULTURA CHINCHORRO P, P121
[35]   Reliability Estimation in a Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework [J].
Geldhof, G. John ;
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Zyphur, Michael J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2014, 19 (01) :72-91
[36]  
Goff P., 2015, WCER Working Paper No. 2015-5
[37]   Predicting the gap: perceptual congruence between American principals and their teachers' ratings of leadership effectiveness [J].
Goff, Peter T. ;
Goldring, Ellen ;
Bickman, Leonard .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2014, 26 (04) :333-359
[38]   Adding missing-data-relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models [J].
Graham, JW .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 10 (01) :80-100
[39]   Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis [J].
Gronn, P .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2002, 13 (04) :423-451
[40]  
Gumus S., 2013, Journal of International Education Research, V9, P371, DOI DOI 10.19030/JIER.V9I4.8089