Development and reliability of a brief skin cancer risk assessment tool

被引:100
|
作者
Glanz, K
Schoenfeld, E
Weinstock, MA
Layi, G
Kidd, J
Shigaki, DM
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, Canc Res Ctr Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION | 2003年 / 27卷 / 04期
关键词
skin cancer; melanoma; risk assessment; cancer prevention;
D O I
10.1016/S0361-090X(03)00094-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study aimed to develop and pilot test a brief skin cancer risk assessment tool (BRAT), a self-administered, instrument that can be reliably used to assess skin cancer risk. To develop the BRAT, we critically reviewed published literature on risk factors; formulated a draft questionnaire; pilot tested the questionnaire; and retested 1 month later. The BRAT items address the key risk factors for melanoma and other keratinocyte skin cancers: ethnicity, personal and family history of skin cancer, mole count, freckles, childhood residence, sunburn history, and sun sensitivity factors (skin color, natural hair color, ease of sunburning and fanning). One hundred sixty-five persons completed the initial BRAT pilot study, and 52 additional people at moderate- or high-risk completed a second BRAT pilot study. Results were as follows: using a dichotomous risk measure, about 90% of subjects would be correctly classified at baseline and follow-up. Weighted K for the total BRAT score (0.41-0.68) and for individual items (0.57-0.99) were fair to good, as were correlation coefficients. The BRAT has acceptable to good reproducibility. Reliability statistics compared favorably with those reported in the literature for similar measures. (C) 2003 International Society for Preventive Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 315
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a Prediction Model for Patients at Risk of Incidental Skin Cancer: A Multicentre Prospective Study
    Iglesias-Puzas, Alvaro
    Conde-Taboada, Alberto
    Aranegui-Arteaga, Beatriz
    Lopez-Bran, Eduardo
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [22] Inter-rater reliability of the occupational violence risk assessment tool for emergency departments
    Cabilan, C. J.
    Eley, Robert
    Snoswell, Centaine
    Jones, Andrew T.
    Johnston, Amy N. B.
    AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2023, 26 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [23] Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study
    Dagci, Selma
    Oren, Besey
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 53 (06) : 1852 - 1862
  • [24] A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity
    Lindgren, M
    Unosson, M
    Krantz, AM
    Ek, AC
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 38 (02) : 190 - 199
  • [25] Content Validity and Interrater Reliability of a Newborn Fall Risk Assessment Tool KAnt Fall
    Savage, Krystal
    Antista, Hannah
    Diamond, Taylor
    Knepp, Alyssa
    Oja, Kenneth
    ADVANCES IN NEONATAL CARE, 2023, 23 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [26] Reliability of a Point-Based VTE Risk Assessment Tool in the Hands of Medical Residents
    Beck, Michael J.
    Haidet, Paul
    Todoric, Krista
    Lehman, Erik
    Sciamanna, Chris
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2011, 6 (04) : 195 - 201
  • [27] Chemical Risk Assessment for Small Businesses: Development of the Chemical Hazard Assessment and Prioritization Risk (CHAP-Risk) Tool
    Tenkate, Thomas
    Kramer, Desre M.
    Drolet, Daniel
    Strahlendorf, Peter
    Peters, Cheryl E.
    Candeloro, Sana
    Holness, D. Linn
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (16):
  • [28] User Perceptions and Reactions to an Online Cancer Risk Assessment Tool: a Process Evaluation of Cancer Risk Check
    Shelly R. Hovick
    Therese B. Bevers
    Jennifer Irvin Vidrine
    Stephanie Kim
    Phokeng M. Dailey
    Lovell A. Jones
    Susan K. Peterson
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2017, 32 : 141 - 147
  • [29] Risk constellations prior to the development of bipolar disorders: Rationale of a new risk assessment tool
    Leopold, Karolina
    Ritter, Philipp
    Correll, Christoph U.
    Marx, Carolin
    Oezguerdal, Seza
    Juckel, Georg
    Bauer, Michael
    Pfennig, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 136 (03) : 1000 - 1010
  • [30] User Perceptions and Reactions to an Online Cancer Risk Assessment Tool: a Process Evaluation of Cancer Risk Check
    Hovick, Shelly R.
    Bevers, Therese B.
    Vidrine, Jennifer Irvin
    Kim, Stephanie
    Dailey, Phokeng M.
    Jones, Lovell A.
    Peterson, Susan K.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2017, 32 (01) : 141 - 147