Toward a richer view of the scientific method - The role of conceptual analysis

被引:80
作者
Machado, Armando
Silva, Francisco J.
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Inst Educ Psicol, P-4710 Braga, Portugal
[2] Univ Redlands, Dept Psychol, Redlands, CA 92373 USA
关键词
conceptual analysis; criticism; Galileo; scientific method; theory;
D O I
10.1037/0003-066X.62.7.671
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Within the complex set of activities that comprise the scientific method, three clusters of activities can be recognized: experimentation, mathematization, and conceptual analysis. In psychology, the first two of these clusters are well-known and valued, but the third seems less known and valued. The authors show the value of these three clusters of scientific method activities in the works of the quintessential scientist Galileo Galilei. They then illustrate how conceptual analysis can be used in psychology to clarify the grammar and meaning of concepts, expose conceptual problems in models, reveal unacknowledged assumptions and steps in arguments, and evaluate the consistency of theoretical accounts. The article concludes with a discussion of three criticisms of conceptual analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 681
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Abelson R.P., 1995, Statistics As Principled Argument, DOI 10.4324/9781410601155
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1957, DISCOVERIES OPINIONS
[3]  
[Anonymous], MIRRORS MIND
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1954, Modern Learning Theory
[5]  
[Anonymous], LOGIC SCI THEORY
[6]  
Bachelard Gaston., 1985, The New Scientific Spirit
[7]  
Bolacchi G, 2004, BEHAV PHILOS, V32, P465
[8]   PSYCHOLOGICAL LITERACY - A 1ST APPROXIMATION [J].
BONEAU, CA .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (07) :891-900
[9]  
Broad W., 1982, Betrayers of the truth: Fraud and deceit in the halls of science
[10]  
Burnham J. C., 1987, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the United States