Satisfaction with care and adherence to treatment when using patient reported outcomes to individualize follow-up care for women with early breast cancer - a pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:39
作者
Riis, Cathrine L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jensen, Pernille T. [4 ,5 ]
Bechmann, Troels [1 ,2 ]
Moller, Soren [5 ,6 ]
Coulter, Angela [2 ,3 ]
Steffensen, Karina D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hosp, Dept Oncol, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Odense, Denmark
[3] Univ Hosp Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hosp, Ctr Shared Decis Making, Vejle, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Inst Clin Med, Fac Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
[6] Odense Univ Hosp, OPEN Open Patient Data Explorat Network, Odense, Denmark
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UNMET NEEDS; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; HEALTH OUTCOMES; QUESTIONNAIRE; CLINICIAN; SURVIVORS; ONCOLOGY; SURVEILLANCE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2020.1717604
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The population of breast cancer survivors is increasing as a positive consequence of early detection and enhanced treatment. The disease and treatment associated side-effects or late-effects often impact on quality of life and daily life functions during survivorship. This calls for optimization of follow-up care. We aimed to evaluate the patients' satisfaction with the care provided, when using electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) to individualize follow-up care in women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. Material and methods: Postmenopausal women treated for hormone receptor positive early breast cancer were included in a pilot randomized controlled trial and randomized to receive standard follow-up care with prescheduled consultations every six months or individualized follow-up care with the active use of ePROs to screen for the need of consultations. ePROs were distributed every third month over a two-year period. Primary outcomes were satisfaction with the assigned follow-up care and unmet needs. Secondary outcomes were use of consultations, adherence to treatment and quality of life. Results: Of the 207 consecutive patients who were potentially eligible for the study, 134 women were enrolled (65%). In total 64 women in standard care and 60 women in individualized care were analyzed. No statistically significant differences were reported in relation to satisfaction, unmet needs, adherence to treatment or quality of life. Women in standard care attended twice as many consultations during the two year follow-up period as women in individualized care; 4.3 (95% CI 3.9-4.7) versus 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.6), p < .001. Conclusion: A significant reduction in consultations was observed for the group attending individualized care without compromising the patients' satisfaction, quality of life or adherence to treatment. For the majority of postmenopausal women treated for early breast cancer, implementation of ePROs to individualize follow-up care was feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 452
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
AARONSON N, 2015, QUAL LIFE RES, V21, P1305
[2]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[3]  
*ASS NORD CANC REG, 2019, NORDCAN
[4]   Feasibility and acceptability of electronic symptom surveillance with clinician feedback using the patient-reported outcomes version of common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) in Danish prostate cancer patients [J].
Baeksted C. ;
Pappot H. ;
Nissen A. ;
Hjollund N.H. ;
Mitchell S.A. ;
Basch E. ;
Bidstrup P.E. ;
Dalton S.O. ;
Johansen C. .
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 1 (1)
[5]   Handling of symptomatic adverse events in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in a cluster randomized trial with electronic patient-reported outcomes as intervention [J].
Baeksted, Christina W. ;
Nissen, Aase ;
Knoop, Ann ;
Christiansen, Marianne ;
Pappot, Helle .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (06) :1295-1296
[6]   Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult Oncology [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Mullins, C. Daniel ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Sloan, Jeff ;
Wenzel, Keith ;
Chauhan, Cynthia ;
Eppard, Wayland ;
Frank, Elizabeth S. ;
Lipscomb, Joseph ;
Raymond, Stephen A. ;
Spencer, Merianne ;
Tunis, Sean .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (34) :4249-4255
[7]   Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes [J].
Brennan, M. E. ;
Gormally, J. F. ;
Butow, P. ;
Boyle, F. M. ;
Spillane, A. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 111 (10) :1899-1908
[8]  
Castor Mei L, 2008, Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol, V2008, P727505, DOI 10.1155/2008/727505
[9]   Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide [J].
Chan, Eric K. H. ;
Edwards, Todd C. ;
Haywood, Kirstie ;
Mikles, Sean P. ;
Newton, Louise .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) :621-627
[10]  
Chen J, 2013, E-POLYMERS, V13