Aggregated demand response modelling for future grid scenarios

被引:36
作者
Marzooghi, Hesamoddin [1 ]
Verbic, Gregor [1 ]
Hill, David J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Aggregated demand modelling; Battery storage; Demand response; Future grids; Photovoltaic generation; Renewable energy sources; 100-PERCENT RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY; MARKET; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2015.11.005
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With the increased penetration of intermittent renewable energy sources (RESs) in future grids (FGs), balancing between supply and demand will become more dependent on demand response (DR) and energy storage. Thus, FG feasibility studies will need to consider DR for modelling net future demand. This paper proposes a generic demand model which represents the aggregated effect of DR in terms of a simplified market model of a FG. The model is based on a unit commitment problem aiming to minimise the system cost, and is intended specifically for modelling net demand by including the effect of DR in FG scenario studies. However, the model does not presume any particular market structure. As such, it is not suitable for modelling of existing electricity markets, but rather its aim is to capture the behaviour of future electricity markets provided a suitable market structure is adopted. The conventional demand model in the optimisation formulation is augmented by including the aggregated effect of numerous users equipped with rooftop photovoltaic (PV)-battery systems at higher voltage levels, without explicitly modelling the distribution level. In the model, the users are aiming to maximise self-consumption and are assumed to be price anticipators. As a case study, the effect of the demand model is studied on the load profile, balancing and loadability of the Australian National Electricity Market in 2020 with the increased penetration of RESs. The results are compared with the demand model in which users are assumed to be price takers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 104
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
AEMO, 2012, 2012 NTNDP ASS INP
[2]  
AEMO, 2013, 100 PER CENT REN STU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ICER CHRONICLE
[4]  
[Anonymous], P IEEE PES INN SMART
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, W WIND SOL INT STUD
[6]   Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time [J].
Budischak, Cory ;
Sewell, DeAnna ;
Thomson, Heather ;
Mach, Leon ;
Veron, Dana E. ;
Kempton, Willett .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2013, 225 :60-74
[7]  
Chapman A, 2015, INT REV HIST EDUC, P1
[8]  
CSIRO FG Forum, 2013, FUT GRID FOR CHANG C
[9]   Least cost 100% renewable electricity scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market [J].
Elliston, Ben ;
MacGill, Lain ;
Diesendorf, Mark .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 59 :270-282
[10]   Simulations of scenarios with 100% renewable electricity in the Australian National Electricity Market [J].
Elliston, Ben ;
Diesendorf, Mark ;
MacGill, Iain .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 45 :606-613