Fusion of high b-value diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR images improves identification of lymph nodes in the pelvis

被引:62
作者
Mir, N. [1 ]
Sohaib, S. A. [1 ]
Collins, D. [1 ]
Koh, D. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, Surrey, England
关键词
diffusion MR; lymph node; fusion imaging; PROSTATE-CANCER; TARGET VOLUME; METASTASES; SIZE; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA; BLADDER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02182.x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Accurate identification of lymph nodes facilitates nodal assessment by size, morphological or MR lymphographic criteria. We compared the MR detection of lymph nodes in patients with pelvic cancers using T2-weighted imaging, and fusion of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted imaging. Twenty patients with pelvic tumours underwent 5-mm axial T2-weighted and DWI (b-values 0-750 s/mm(2)) on a 1.5T system. Fusion images of b = 750 s/mm(2) diffusion-weighted MR and T2-weighted images were created. Two radiologists evaluated in consensus the T2-weighted images and fusion images independently. For each image set, the location and diameter of pelvic nodes were recorded, and nodal visibility was scored using a 4-point scale (0-3). Nodal visualisation was compared using Relative to an Identified Distribution (RIDIT) analysis. The mean RIDIT score describes the probability that a randomly selected node will be better visualised relative to the other image set. One hundred fourteen pelvic nodes (mean 5.9 mm; 2-10 mm) were identified on T2-weighted images and 161 nodes (mean 4.3 mm; 2-10 mm) on fusion images. Using fusion images, 47 additional nodes were detected compared with T2-weighted images alone (eight external iliac, 24 inguinal, 12 obturator, two pen-rectal, one presacral). Nodes detected only on fusion images were 2-9 mm (mean 3.7 mm). Nodal visualisation was better using fusion images compared with T2-weighted images (mean RIDIT score 0.689 vs 0.302). Fusion of diffusion-weighted MR with T2-weighted images improves identification of pelvic lymph nodes compared with T2-weighted images alone. The improved nodal identification may aid treatment planning and further nodal characterisation.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 364
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1968, NEW ENGL J MED, V279, P1453
[2]  
BULLIMORE D, 1988, Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, V2, P43
[3]   PELVIC LYMPH NODE TOPOGRAPHY FOR RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING FROM FERUMOXTRAN-10 CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING [J].
Dinniwell, Robert ;
Chan, Philip ;
Czarnota, Gregory ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Jhaveri, Kartik ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Fyles, Anthony ;
Jaffray, David ;
Milosevic, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03) :844-851
[4]   Ridit scores for analysis and interpretation of ordinal pain data [J].
Donaldson, GW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-LONDON, 1998, 2 (03) :221-227
[5]   UPPER ABDOMINAL LYMPH-NODES - CRITERIA FOR NORMAL SIZE DETERMINED WITH CT [J].
DORFMAN, RE ;
ALPERN, MB ;
GROSS, BH ;
SANDLER, MA .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (02) :319-322
[6]   NORMAL MEDIASTINAL LYMPH-NODE SIZE AND NUMBER - CT AND ANATOMIC STUDY [J].
GENEREUX, GP ;
HOWIE, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1984, 142 (06) :1095-1100
[7]  
Grubnic S, 2002, CLIN RADIOL, V57, P193, DOI 10.1053/crad.2001.0893
[8]   Prostate Cancer: Detection of Lymph Node Metastases Outside the Routine Surgical Area with Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR Imaging [J].
Heesakkers, Roel A. M. ;
Jager, Gerrit J. ;
Hovels, Anke M. ;
de Hoop, Bartjan ;
van den Bosch, Harrie C. M. ;
Raat, Frank ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Mulders, Peter F. A. ;
van der Kaa, Christina Hulsbergen ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (02) :408-414
[9]   Invited commentary: Authors' reply - MR evaluation of normal retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph nodes [J].
Husband, JE ;
Grubnic, S ;
Vinnicombe, SJ ;
Norman, AR .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 57 (03) :203-204
[10]   Lymph node detection by MRI before and after a systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy [J].
Klerkx, W. M. ;
Heintz, A. P. M. ;
Mali, W. P. ThM ;
de Kort, G. A. P. ;
Takahara, T. ;
van Dorst, E. B. L. ;
Peeters, P. H. M. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) :315-318