Waste treatment: an environmental, economic and social analysis with a new group fuzzy PROMETHEE approach

被引:51
作者
Lolli, Francesco [1 ]
Ishizaka, Alessio [2 ]
Gamberini, Rita [1 ]
Rimini, Bianca [1 ]
Ferrari, Anna Maria [1 ]
Marinelli, Simona [3 ]
Savazza, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Sci & Methods Engn, Via Amendola 2,Padigl Morselli, I-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, Ctr Operat Res & Logist, Portland St Richmond Bldg, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
[3] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Civil Bldg Engn & Architecture, Via Brecce Bianche 12, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
关键词
Waste treatment; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy theory; PROMETHEE; Group decision; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; MODEL; LCA; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; SELECTION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-015-1087-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most complex decisions involve several stakeholders and therefore need to be solved using a group multi-criteria decision method. However, stakeholders or decision-makers often have divergent views, especially in the environmental sector. In order to integrate this divergence, a new group fuzzy PROMETHEE approach is introduced to combine the traditional environmental criteria of life cycle assessments with social and economic criteria. The modelling of uncertainty within the group of decision-makers using a fuzzy approach makes this method unique. The proposed fuzzy approach differs significantly from the standard one. The decision-makers express their judgments in crisp forms. In order to take into account the intrinsic dispersion of judgments within the group, a posteriori fuzzification procedure is applied. The crisp values are not simply aggregated; they are converted into a triangular fuzzy number based on the given evaluations. As a consequence, the definition of fuzzy membership functions, as required in standard fuzzy logic, is not required, which simplifies the process and makes it more reliable. The new approach is illustrated with a real case study concerning the selection of the best waste treatment solution in a natural park from among a traditional incinerator and an innovative integrated plant.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1332
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review [J].
Achillas, Charisios ;
Moussiopoulos, Nicolas ;
Karagiannidis, Avraam ;
Banias, Georgias ;
Perkoulidis, George .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2013, 31 (02) :115-129
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Methodological Sheets for Sub-categories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 14040 ISO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment - Making informed choices on products
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 23021 EN2 EUR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 23021 EN EUR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1982, LAIDE LADECISION NAT
[9]   An LCA model for waste incineration enhanced with new technologies for metal recovery and application to the case of Switzerland [J].
Boesch, Michael E. ;
Vadenbo, Carl ;
Saner, Dominik ;
Huter, Christoph ;
Hellweg, Stefanie .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (02) :378-389
[10]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656