Twenty-four-hour subjective and pharmacological effects of ad-libitum electronic and combustible cigarette use among dual users

被引:20
作者
Harvanko, Arit M. [1 ]
St Helen, Gideon [1 ,2 ]
Nardone, Natalie [2 ]
Addo, Newton [2 ]
Benowitz, Neal L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Tobacco Control Res & Educ, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Clin Pharmacol Res Program,Zuckerberg San Francis, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Bioengn & Therapeut Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Area under the curve; behavior; blood; e-cigarettes; ENDS; nicotine; plasma; smoking; vaping; NICOTINE DELIVERY; ABUSE LIABILITY; WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS; VEGETABLE GLYCERIN; PROPYLENE-GLYCOL; DEPENDENCE; SMOKING; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/add.14931
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims Relative pharmacological effects of e-cigarettes and cigarettes during 24 hours of ad-libitum use have not been described. In this study, 24-hour blood plasma nicotine concentrations and 48-hour subjective effects with use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes were measured among dual users. Design Two-arm within-subject cross-over design with preferred e-cigarette or cigarette ad-libitum use over 48 hours. Setting Hospital research ward in San Francisco, California, USA. Participants Thirty-six healthy dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes (n = 8, 25% females). Measurements Twenty-four-hour blood plasma nicotine and cotinine concentrations and 48-hour self-reported nicotine withdrawal symptoms and rewarding effects. Findings Analyses used analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based mixed models with order of product (e-cigarette or cigarette) and product type (combustible cigarette or type of e-cigarette) as fixed effects, and subject as a repeated effect. During a 24-hour period, e-cigarettes produced lower nicotine exposure than cigarettes for the majority of users, although 25% received more nicotine from e-cigarettes, which was predicted by more frequent e-cigarette use or greater dependence. Compared to cigarette smoking, nicotine exposure for variable-power tank users was similar, while cig-a-like (t((30)) = 2.71, P = 0.011, d = 0.745) and fixed-power tank users (t((30)) = 3.37, P = 0.002, d = 0.993) were exposed to less nicotine. Cigarettes were rated higher than e-cigarettes on some desirable subjective effects (e.g. psychological reward, t((322)) = 7.24 P < 0.001, d = 0.432), but withdrawal symptom reduction was comparable. No differences were found between e-cigarette types, but Bayes factors indicate that these measures were insensitive. Conclusions During a 24-hour period in a hospital setting in the United States, nicotine exposure for dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes was similar when using cigarettes or variable-power tank devices only but was lower for those using cig-a-like or fixed-power devices only. Despite lower nicotine levels, all types of e-cigarette were effective in preventing withdrawal symptoms. E-cigarettes were rated less rewarding than cigarettes.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1159
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Why do people use electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes)? A content analysis of Twitter, 2012-2015
    Ayers, John W.
    Leas, Eric C.
    Allem, Jon-Patrick
    Benton, Adrian
    Dredze, Mark
    Althouse, Benjamin M.
    Cruz, Tess B.
    Unger, Jennifer B.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [2] Using Bayes factors for testing hypotheses about intervention effectiveness in addictions research
    Beard, Emma
    Dienes, Zoltan
    Muirhead, Colin
    West, Robert
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2016, 111 (12) : 2230 - 2247
  • [3] CIRCADIAN BLOOD NICOTINE CONCENTRATIONS DURING CIGARETTE-SMOKING
    BENOWITZ, NL
    KUYT, F
    JACOB, P
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1982, 32 (06) : 758 - 764
  • [4] Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial
    Bullen, C.
    McRobbie, H.
    Thornley, S.
    Glover, M.
    Lin, R.
    Laugesen, M.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2010, 19 (02) : 98 - 103
  • [5] Confirmatory factor analyses and reliability of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Bushmakin, Andrew G.
    Baker, Christine L.
    Merikle, Elizabeth
    Olufade, Abayomi O.
    Gilbert, David G.
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2007, 32 (05) : 912 - 923
  • [6] Transitions in electronic cigarette use among adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves 1 and 2 (2013-2015)
    Coleman, Blair
    Rostron, Brian
    Johnson, Sarah E.
    Persoskie, Alexander
    Pearson, Jennifer
    Stanton, Cassandra
    Choi, Kelvin
    Anic, Gabriella
    Goniewicz, Maciej Lukasz
    Cummings, Kenneth Michael
    Kasza, Karin A.
    Silveira, Marushka L.
    Delnevo, Cristine
    Niaura, Raymond
    Abrams, David B.
    Kimmel, Heather L.
    Borek, Nicolette
    Compton, Wilson M.
    Hyland, Andrew
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2019, 28 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [7] Cox L S, 2001, Nicotine Tob Res, V3, P7, DOI 10.1080/14622200020032051
  • [8] The Effects of E-Cigarette Visual Appearance on Craving and Withdrawal Symptoms in Abstinent Smokers
    Dawkins, Lynne
    Munafo, Marcus
    Christoforou, Gina
    Olumegbon, Naomi
    Soar, Kirstie
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2016, 30 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [9] E-cigarettes: Impact of E-liquid Components and Device Characteristics on Nicotine Exposure
    DeVito, Elise E.
    Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra
    [J]. CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 16 (04) : 438 - 459
  • [10] E-cigarettes emit very high formaldehyde levels only in conditions that are aversive to users: A replication study under verified realistic use conditions
    Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
    Voudris, Vassilis
    Spyrou, Alketa
    Poulas, Konstantinos
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 109 : 90 - 94