Measurement of motor evoked potentials following repetitive magnetic motor cortex stimulation during isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia

被引:18
作者
Rohde, V [1 ]
Krombach, GA
Baumert, JH
Kreitschmann-Andermahr, I
Weinzierl, M
Gilsbach, JM
机构
[1] Tech Univ RWTH Aachen, Dept Neurosurg, Aachen, Germany
[2] Tech Univ RWTH Aachen, Dept Anesthesiol, Aachen, Germany
关键词
brain; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; equipment; monitors; monitoring; motor evoked potentials;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeg224
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Isoflurane and propofol reduce the recordability of compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) following single transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (sTCMS). Repetition of the magnetic stimulus (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTCMS) might allow the inhibition caused by anaesthesia with isoflurane or propofol to be overcome. Methods. We applied rTCMS (four stimuli; inter-stimulus intervals of 3, 4, 5 ms (333, 250, 200 Hz), output 2.5 Tesla) in 27 patients and recorded CMAP from the hypothenar and anterior tibial muscle. Anaesthesia was maintained with fentanyl 0.5-1 mug kg(-1) h(-1) and either isoflurane 1.2% (10 patients) or propofol 5 mg kg(-1) h(-1) with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen (17 patients). Results. No CMAP were detected during isoflurane anaesthesia. During propofol anaesthesia 333 Hz, four-pulse magnetic stimulation evoked CMAP in the hypothenar muscle in 75%, and in the anterior tibial muscle in 65% of the patients. Less response was obtained with 250 and 200 Hz stimulation. Conclusions. In most patients, rTCMS can overcome suppression of CMAP during propofol/nitrous oxide anaesthesia, but not during isoflurane anaesthesia. A train of four magnetic stimuli at a frequency of 333 Hz is most effective in evoking potentials from the upper and lower limb muscles. The authors conclude that rTCMS can be used for evaluation of the descending motor pathways during anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 492
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF CORTICOSPINAL ACTIVATION BY MAGNETIC COIL AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF MONKEY MOTOR CORTEX [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
QUIRK, GJ ;
STEWART, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 77 (05) :390-401
[2]  
BARKER AT, 1987, NEUROSURGERY, V20, P100
[3]   DIRECT COMPARISON OF CORTICOSPINAL VOLLEYS IN HUMAN-SUBJECTS TO TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
BURKE, D ;
HICKS, R ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
STEPHEN, J ;
WOODFORTH, I ;
CRAWFORD, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 470 :383-393
[4]   Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction [J].
Calancie, B ;
Harris, W ;
Brindle, GF ;
Green, BA ;
Landy, HJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 95 (02) :161-168
[5]   DIFFERENT SITES OF ACTION OF ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN-BRAIN [J].
DAY, BL ;
THOMPSON, PD ;
DICK, JP ;
NAKASHIMA, K ;
MARSDEN, CD .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1987, 75 (01) :101-106
[6]  
ELBEHEIRY H, 1989, EXP BRAIN RES, V77, P87
[7]  
FISHBACK AS, 1995, NEUROSURGERY, V37, P969, DOI 10.1227/00006123-199511000-00017
[8]   THE EFFECT OF ETOMIDATE ON MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS INDUCED BY TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN THE MONKEY [J].
GHALY, RF ;
STONE, JL ;
LEVY, WJ ;
ROCCAFORTE, P ;
BRUNNER, EB .
NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 27 (06) :936-942
[9]   ANESTHETIC EFFECTS ON MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN DOGS [J].
GLASSMAN, SD ;
SHIELDS, CB ;
LINDEN, RD ;
ZHANG, YP ;
NIXON, AR ;
JOHNSON, JR .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (08) :1083-1089
[10]   Perioperative use of transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Gugino, LD ;
Aglio, LS ;
Potts, G ;
Grimson, WEL ;
Shenton, ME ;
Kikinis, R ;
Alexander, E ;
Gonzalez, AA ;
Romero, R ;
Ettinger, GJ ;
Cote, WA ;
Leventon, ME ;
Black, PM .
TECHNIQUES IN NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 7 (01) :33-51