Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips

被引:111
作者
Panah, A. Komak [1 ]
Yazdi, M. [1 ]
Ghalandarzadeh, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Sch Civil Engn, Univ Coll Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Geosynthetics; Polymeric strip; Shaking table; Reinforcement arrangement; Reinforced soil; CENTRIFUGE MODEL TESTS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; PULLOUT RESISTANCE; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; GEOCELL; BEHAVIOR; GEOSYNTHETICS; BACKFILL; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.01.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The seismic behavior of reinforced soil retaining walls with polymeric strips is examined. A series of 1-g shaking table tests were employed on 80 cm high reinforced-soil wall models. Also, some uniaxial tensile and pullout tests were performed in reduced-scale models to determine the best material to be used instead of polymeric strips in models. The effect of the length of reinforcement, number of steps and shape of the reinforcement arrangement (zigzag vs. parallel) on the failure mode, the wall displacement, and the acceleration amplification factor are investigated. Findings suggest that walls built with extensible reinforcement were flexible and the internal failure mechanism in the reinforced zone for these walls involved a bulging mode. The parallel implementation of reinforcements is more favorable as it decreases the displacements more than 50% before failure compared to the zig-zag arrangement. Also, wall displacement was reduced with a decrease and increase in the reinforcement length at bottom and top layers, respectively and this improved the wall behavior. Therefore, reducing the reinforcement length at the bottom of the wall without increasing the length of upper layers is not recommended as it can noticeably increase wall displacement from 1.2 to 7 times under different waves. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 161
页数:14
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [11] Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Bathurst, R. J.
    Nernheim, A.
    Walters, D. L.
    Allen, T. M.
    Burgess, P.
    Saunders, D. D.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 16 (01) : 43 - 59
  • [12] Bathurst R.J., 2009, Linear and Non Linear Numerical Analysis of Foundations, P131
  • [13] Shaking table testing of geofoam seismic buffers
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    Zarnani, Saman
    Gaskin, Andrew
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (04) : 324 - 332
  • [14] Seismic response analysis of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall
    Bathurst, RJ
    Hatami, K
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 5 (1-2) : 127 - 166
  • [15] Centrifuge modeling test of a geotextile-reinforced wall with a very wet clayey backfill
    Chen, Huel-Tsyr
    Hung, Wen-Yi
    Chang, Chin-Chang
    Chen, Yuan-Ji
    Lee, Chung-Jung
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2007, 25 (06) : 346 - 359
  • [16] Numerical analysis of geocell-reinforced retaining structures
    Chen, Rong-Her
    Wu, Chang-Ping
    Huang, Feng-Chi
    Shen, Che-Wei
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2013, 39 : 51 - 62
  • [17] Modelling discrete soil reinforcement in numerical limit analysis
    Clarke, Samuel D.
    Smith, Colin C.
    Gilbert, Matthew
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 50 (07) : 705 - 715
  • [18] Large scale field tests on geogrid-reinforced granular fill underlain by clay soil
    Demir, Ahmet
    Laman, Mustafa
    Yildiz, Abdulazim
    Ornek, Murat
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2013, 38 : 1 - 15
  • [19] Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls
    Ehrlich, M.
    Mirmoradi, S. H.
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2013, 40 : 28 - 36
  • [20] Evaluation of the effect of compaction on the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Ehrlich, M.
    Mirmoradi, S. H.
    Saramago, R. P.
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2012, 34 : 108 - 115