Policy mixes for just sustainable development in regions specialized in carbon-intensive industries: the case of two Norwegian petro-maritime regions

被引:13
作者
Afewerki, Samson [1 ,2 ]
Karlsen, Asbjorn [2 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Ocean, Dept Aquaculture, Trondheim, Norway
[2] NTNU, Dept Geog, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Geography of sustainability transitions; just sustainable transition; tripartite collaboration; Norwegian social democratic model; institutional layering; INNOVATION POLICY; TRANSITIONS; GEOGRAPHY; CREATION; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1080/09654313.2021.1941786
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research on the Geography of Sustainability Transitions (GOST) has enhanced our understanding in how place-based factors condition sustainability transitions. Its emphasis on the geography of niche development, however, neglects regime-level responses to regional sustainably transitions imperatives. Given the urgency of sustainability transitions, recent sustainability transitions research has emphasized an active destabilization and/or phase-out of incumbent carbon-intensive industries. However, this poses normative and practical challenges for regions heavily dependent in these sectors. Here the challenge is how to ensure an inclusive transition. This paper contributes to GOST by focusing on distributional and procedural dimensions of policy mixes, relying on just transition and institutionalist literature. Our longitudinal case study of two Norwegian oil-dependent regions, Stord and Verdal identifies phases separated by critical junctures, with different policy mixes. Underpinned by the Norwegian tripartite cooperation model, the multi-scalar policy mixes in the regions has focused on the sector's decarbonization, rather than its phase-out, while developing renewable energy sectors through technology-push. Supporting short term business as usual, this provides the industry time to prepare for emerging renewable technologies and reducing negative impacts of transitions. We suggest that just sustainable development of such regions requires coherent multi-scalar policy mixes, and legitimacy and participation among key actors.
引用
收藏
页码:2273 / 2292
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   oClustero Creation by Reconfiguring Communities of Practice [J].
Karlsen, Asbjorn .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2011, 19 (05) :753-773
[22]   Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies [J].
Kern, Florian ;
Rogge, Karoline S. ;
Howlett, Michael .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (10)
[23]   Moving beyond disruptive innovation: A review of disruption in sustainability transitions [J].
Kivimaa, Paula ;
Laakso, Senja ;
Lonkila, Annika ;
Kaljonen, Minna .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2021, 38 :110-126
[24]   Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions [J].
Kivimaa, Paula ;
Kern, Florian .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) :205-217
[25]   Legitimation, institutions and regional path creation: a cross-national study of offshore wind [J].
MacKinnon, Danny ;
Karlsen, Asbjorn ;
Dawley, Stuart ;
Steen, Markus ;
Afewerki, Samson ;
Kenzhegaliyeva, Assiya .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2022, 56 (04) :644-655
[26]  
Mahoney J., 2010, Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power
[27]   The green flings: Norwegian oil and gas industry's engagement in offshore wind power [J].
Makitie, Tuukka ;
Normann, Hakon E. ;
Thune, Taran M. ;
Gonzalez, Jakoba Sraml .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 127 :269-279
[28]   Challenges in the acceleration of sustainability transitions [J].
Markard, Jochen ;
Geels, Frank W. ;
Raven, Rob .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (08)
[29]   Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects [J].
Markard, Jochen ;
Raven, Rob ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (06) :955-967
[30]  
Neerland H., 2008, MELLOM AKER KER EVAL