UDEC-AUTODYN Hybrid Modeling of a Large-Scale Underground Explosion Test

被引:61
作者
Deng, X. F. [1 ]
Chen, S. G. [2 ]
Zhu, J. B. [3 ]
Zhou, Y. X. [4 ]
Zhao, Z. Y. [5 ,6 ]
Zhao, J. [7 ]
机构
[1] China Tiesiju Civil Engn Grp Co LTD, Hefei 230023, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, MOE Key Lab Transportat Tunnel Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Def Sci & Technol Agcy, Singapore 109679, Singapore
[5] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Ctr Underground Space, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[6] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[7] Monash Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Jointed rock mass; Wave propagation; Explosion test; UDEC; AUTODYN; Peak particle velocity; MULTIPLE PARALLEL FRACTURES; JOINTED ROCK MASSES; WAVE-PROPAGATION; STRESS WAVES; DAMAGE; ATTENUATION; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-014-0600-2
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In this study, numerical modeling of a large-scale decoupled underground explosion test with 10 tons of TNT in A"lvdalen, Sweden is performed by combining DEM and FEM with codes UDEC and AUTODYN. AUTODYN is adopted to model the explosion process, blast wave generation, and its action on the explosion chamber surfaces, while UDEC modeling is focused on shock wave propagation in jointed rock masses surrounding the explosion chamber. The numerical modeling results with the hybrid AUTODYN-UDEC method are compared with empirical estimations, purely AUTODYN modeling results, and the field test data. It is found that in terms of peak particle velocity, empirical estimations are much smaller than the measured data, while purely AUTODYN modeling results are larger than the test data. The UDEC-AUTODYN numerical modeling results agree well with the test data. Therefore, the UDEC-AUTODYN method is appropriate in modeling a large-scale explosive detonation in a closed space and the following wave propagation in jointed rock masses. It should be noted that joint mechanical and spatial properties adopted in UDEC-AUTODYN modeling are determined with empirical equations and available geological data, and they may not be sufficiently accurate.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 747
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P INT S DEF CONSTR S
[2]  
[Anonymous], UDEC MAN VERS 4 0
[3]  
AUTODYN, 2005, THEOR MAN REV 4 3 THEOR MAN REV 4 3
[4]  
Bakhtar K, 1994, ASCTR947014 US AIR F
[5]   Distinct Element Modelling in Static and Dynamic Conditions with Application to an Underground Archaeological Site [J].
Barla, G. ;
Monacis, G. ;
Perino, A. ;
Hatzor, Y. H. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2010, 43 (06) :877-890
[6]  
BARTON N, 1983, P INT S ENG GEOL UND, V2, P51
[7]  
Bergab, 2000, FEAS STUD ROCK COND
[8]  
Brady BH, 1990, VERIFICATION STUDIES, P551
[9]   Effects of multiple parallel fractures on apparent attenuation of stress waves in rock masses [J].
Cai, JG ;
Zhao, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2000, 37 (04) :661-682
[10]  
Cai JG, 2001, THESIS NANYANG TU SI