Effect of compaction procedure on air void structure of asphalt concrete

被引:12
作者
Tarefder, Rafiqul A. [1 ]
Ahmad, Mohiuddin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Civil Engn, MSC 01 1070,1 Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Compaction; Gyratory; Kneading; Permeability; Pavements; CONDUCTIVITY; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.054
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Past studies found a significant difference of strength between laboratory and field compacted asphalt concrete (AC). This study evaluated the pore structure of AC compacted by gyratory compactor, linear kneading compactor (LKC) and field cores. The different components of pores were determined and compared for different compaction procedures. The variation of permeability as well as moisture damage of samples prepared by different compaction procedures was also compared. It was observed that the pore structure of field samples is totally different from linear kneading compacted and gyratory compacted samples. Permeability of field samples does not depend on the level of compaction as much as for laboratory compacted samples. The indirect tensile strength (IDT) of field samples is always less than gyratory samples and more than linear kneading compacted samples. Field samples and linear kneading compacted samples are more susceptible to moisture than the gyratory compacted samples. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 157
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] AASHTO, 2007, AASHTO T283
  • [2] [Anonymous], 840544 EMPA FE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, MOIST IND SENS TEST
  • [4] [Anonymous], D7063 ASTM
  • [5] [Anonymous], D6752 ASTM
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, 511610 COL PROC LAB
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, D6925 ASTM
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2011, D2041 ASTM
  • [9] Button J.W., 1994, TRANSPORTATION RES R, P193
  • [10] Consuegra A., 1989, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1228, P80