Concrete Review as Indirect Constitutional Complaint in French Constitutional Law: A Comparative Perspective

被引：6

作者：

Pfersmann, Otto ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Paris 01, F-75231 Paris 05, France

来源：

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW | 2010年 / 6卷 / 02期

关键词：

A posteriori review; A priori review; Common law; Conseil Constitutionnel; Constitutional review; France; Fundamental rights; Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité; Rule of law;

D O I：

10.1017/S1574019610200044

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

1958: a priori review of parliamentary legislation to keep Parliament within its limited legislative competences - 2008: a posteriori review to protect citizens' rights and freedoms - Varieties of concrete review - Originality of the new French procedure - An indirect constitutional complaint: raised by a litigating party, transmitted by an ordinary court and decided by the Constitutional Council - Obstacle to transmission: declaration of conformity in the motives of an earlier decision by Constitutional Council - Conceptual, logical and legal reasons for a strict distinction between normative content and justificatory discourse in judgments - Setting on par of motives and operative part transforms French legal system into a specific form of common law and weakens the Rule of Law

引用

页码：223 / 248

页数：26

共 45 条

[1] [Anonymous], 2005, LINTERPRETATION CONS
[2] Cappelletti Mauro., 1971, JUDICIAL REV CONT WO
[3] de Malberg R. Carre, 1933, CONFRONTATION THEORI
[4] de Malberg Raymond Carre, 1931, EXPRESSION VOLONTE G
[5] DI MANNO Thierry., 1997, Le Juge Constitutionnel et la Technique des Decisions Interpretatives en France et en Italie
[6] DWORKININ R, 1986, LAWS EMPIRE
[7] DWORKININ R, 1985, MATTER PRINCIPLE
[8] DWORKININ R, 1977, TAKING RIGHTS SERIOU
[9] FAVOREU L, 1992, ECRITURE CONSTITUTIO
[10] FAVOREU L, 1981, REV INT DROIT COMP, V33, P255

← 1 2 3 4 5 →