Experimental Study of Coflow Propane-Air Laminar Diffusion Flames at Subatmospheric Pressures

被引:2
作者
Yao, Jiajie [1 ]
Liu, Jiahao [2 ]
Wang, Jian [3 ]
机构
[1] Changshu Inst Technol, Sch Mat Engn, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Ocean Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, State Key Lab Fire Sci, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 13期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
soot formation; flame structure; coflow diffusion flame; subatmospheric pressure; TEMPERATURE-FIELD STRUCTURE; SOOT FORMATION; METHANE; FRACTION; ETHANE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.3390/app11135979
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The effect of pressure on the flame's physical structure and soot formation of the coflow propane-air laminar diffusion flames was studied experimentally at subatmospheric pressures from 30 to 101 kPa. Flames with a constant fuel mass flow rate combined with two different coflow air mass flow rates were investigated at different pressures. The spatially resolved relative soot volume fraction was measured using the laser-induced incandescence (LII) method. The height of the visible flame decreased moderately as the pressure (p) reduced from 101 to 30 kPa. The maximum flame diameter increased proportionally to p(n), where the exponent changed from -0.4 to -0.52 as the air-to-fuel velocity ratio decreased from 1.0 to 0.5. Strong pressure dependence of the maximum relative soot volume fraction and the normalized maximum soot mass flow were observed and could be described by a power law relationship. However, a nonmonotonic dependence of soot formation on the air-to-fuel velocity ratio was observed at all the considered pressures.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Property predictions demonstrate that structural diversity can improve the performance of polyoxymethylene ethers as potential bio-based diesel fuels [J].
Bartholet, Danielle L. ;
Arellano-Trevino, Martha A. ;
Chan, Fan Liang ;
Lucas, Stephen ;
Zhu, Junqing ;
St John, Peter C. ;
Alleman, Teresa L. ;
McEnally, Charles S. ;
Pfefferle, Lisa D. ;
Ruddy, Daniel A. ;
Windom, Bret ;
Foust, Thomas D. ;
Reardon, Kenneth F. .
FUEL, 2021, 295
[2]   Soot formation and temperature field structure in laminar propane-air diffusion flames at elevated pressures [J].
Bento, Decio S. ;
Thomson, Kevin A. ;
Gulder, Omer L. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2006, 145 (04) :765-778
[3]   A numerical study on the effects of pressure and gravity in laminar ethylene diffusion flames [J].
Charest, Marc R. J. ;
Groth, Clinton P. T. ;
Guelder, Oemer L. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2011, 158 (10) :1933-1945
[4]   On the effect of pressure on soot nanostructure: A Raman spectroscopy investigation [J].
Commodo, Mario ;
Karatas, Ahmet E. ;
De Falco, Gianluigi ;
Minutolo, Patrizia ;
D'Anna, Andrea ;
Gulder, Omer L. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2020, 219 :13-19
[5]   Effects of carbon dioxide addition to fuel on flame radiation fraction in propane diffusion flames [J].
Dou, Yuling ;
Liu, Haiqiang ;
Liu, Bin ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Liu, Yongqiang ;
Cheng, Xiaozhang ;
Tao, Changfa .
ENERGY, 2021, 218 (218)
[6]  
Glassman I., 2015, COMBUSTION, P393
[7]   Unified behaviour of maximum soot yields of methane, ethane and propane laminar diffusion flames at high pressures [J].
Guelder, Oemer L. ;
Intasopa, Gorngrit ;
Joo, Hyun I. ;
Mandatori, Paul M. ;
Bento, Decio S. ;
Vaillancourt, Marie E. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2011, 158 (10) :2037-2044
[8]   Comparative study on soot characteristics of non-swirling and swirling inverse diffusion iso-octane flames with biofuel 2,5-dimethylfuran addition [J].
Jiang, Bo ;
Jia, Penghui ;
Liu, Dong .
JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2020, 93 (05) :2108-2123
[9]   Soot formation and temperature field structure in co-flow laminar methane-air diffusion flames at pressures from 10 to 60 atm [J].
Joo, Hyun I. ;
Guelder, Oemer L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2009, 32 :769-775
[10]   Soot formation in high pressure laminar diffusion flames [J].
Karatas, Ahmet E. ;
Guelder, Oemer L. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2012, 38 (06) :818-845