Clinic- and Community-Based National Diabetes Prevention Programs in Los Angeles

被引:9
作者
DeFosset, Amelia R. [1 ]
Sivashanmugam, Megala [1 ]
Mosst, Jennifer [1 ]
Kuo, Tony [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Los Angeles Cty Dept Publ Hlth, Div Chron Dis & Injury Prevent, 3530 Wilshire Blvd,8th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90010 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
clinics; community-based organizations; diabetes; prediabetes; prevention; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; ATTENDANCE; SYSTEM; DPP;
D O I
10.1177/10901981211016759
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Clinics and community-based organizations (CBOs) are priority settings for implementing the evidence-based National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Both program settings present theoretical advantages and disadvantages for engaging and helping populations most at risk for diabetes achieve lifestyle change goals. To date, few studies have compared implementation across them. The present study describes participant characteristics and lifestyle change outcomes across a sample of clinic- and community-based National DPPs which delivered services in Los Angeles during 2015 to 2018 (two clinics, two CBOs, combined n = 265 participants). Analyses examined participant gender, age, race/ethnicity, baseline body mass index, and program attributes such as screening method and language of instruction. Negative binomial regression models tested for differences in program attendance, mean weekly physical activity, and percent change in body weight by setting. Overall, participants were largely Hispanic/Latinx (81.51%) and female (90.19%). Programs operated by CBOs engaged other race/ethnic groups including Black participants more frequently than those operated by clinics (20.56% vs. 0%); the latter engaged more men (15.29% vs. 7.22%). Few participants in any setting met the National DPP's weight loss goal (clinic: 15.29%, CBO: 20.00%). Participating in a community-based program was initially associated with higher attendance and mean weekly physical activity, but associations were not significant after adjusting for covariates. Study results have practice implications for National DPP implementation and can help inform future efforts to scale and spread the program in Los Angeles and nationally.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 657
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into the community - The DEPLOY pilot study [J].
Ackermann, Ronald T. ;
Finch, Emily A. ;
Brizendine, Edward ;
Zhou, Honghong ;
Marrero, David G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (04) :357-363
[2]   Preventing Type 2 Diabetes in Communities Across the U.S. The National Diabetes Prevention Program [J].
Albright, Ann L. ;
Gregg, Edward W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (04) :S346-S351
[3]   Reach and Use of Diabetes Prevention Services in the United States, 2016-2017 [J].
Ali, Mohammed K. ;
Bullard, Kai McKeever ;
Imperatore, Giuseppina ;
Benoit, Stephen R. ;
Rolka, Deborah B. ;
Albright, Ann L. ;
Gregg, Edward W. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (05)
[4]   How Effective Were Lifestyle Interventions In Real-World Settings That Were Modeled On The Diabetes Prevention Program? [J].
Ali, Mohammed K. ;
Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B. ;
Williamson, David F. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (01) :67-75
[5]  
American Medical Association Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, DIABETES PREVENTION
[6]   Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program Into Practice in the General Community Findings From the Montana Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Prevention Program [J].
Amundson, Helen A. ;
Butcher, Marcene K. ;
Gohdes, Dorothy ;
Hall, Taryn O. ;
Harwell, Todd S. ;
Helgerson, Steven D. ;
Vanderwood, Karl K. .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2009, 35 (02) :209-223
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Diabetes Prevention and Recognition Program: Standards and operating procedures
[8]   ATTENDANCE AT HEALTH PROMOTION PROGRAMS - BASE-LINE PREDICTORS AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES [J].
ATKINS, CJ ;
SENN, K ;
RUPP, J ;
KAPLAN, RM ;
PATTERSON, TL ;
SALLIS, JF ;
NADER, PR .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1990, 17 (04) :417-428
[9]  
California Healthy Places Index, 2018, CAL HLTH PLAC IND
[10]  
CDC, 2020, National Diabetes Statistics Report