Absolute cardiovascular disease risk and shared decision making in primary care:: A randomized controlled trial

被引:158
作者
Krones, Tanja [1 ,2 ]
Keller, Heidemarie [3 ]
Soennichsen, Andreas [4 ]
Sadowski, Eva-Maria [3 ]
Baum, Erika [3 ]
Wegscheider, Karl [5 ]
Rochon, Justine [6 ]
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Marburg, Dept Gen Practice Family Med, Marburg, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Dept Bioeth Clin Eth, Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Marburg, Dept Family Med, Marburg, Germany
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Inst Gen Practice Family Med & Prevent, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Univ Hamburg, Dept Med Biometry & Epidemiol, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp, Statistician Ctr Clin Studies, Regensburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1370/afm.854
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE We wanted to determine the effect of promoting the effective communication of absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and shared decision making through disseminating a simple decision aid for use in family practice consultations. METHODS The study was based on a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (phase 111) with continuing medical education (CME) groups of family physicians as the unit of randomization. In the intervention arm, 44 physicians (7 CME groups) consecutively recruited 550 patients in whom cholesterol levels were measured. Forty-seven physicians in the control arm (7 CME groups) similarly included 582 patients. Four hundred sixty patients (83.6%) of the intervention arm and 466 patients (80.1%) of the control arm were seen at follow-up. Physicians attended 2 interactive CME sessions and received a booklet, a paper-based risk calculator, and individual summary sheets for each patient. Control physicians attended 1 CME-session on an alternative topic. Main outcome measures were patient satisfaction and participation after the index consultation, change in CVD risk status, and decisional regret at 6 months' follow-up. RESULTS Intervention patients were significantly more satisfied with process and result (Patient Participation Scale, difference 0.80, P < .001). Decisional regret was significantly lower at follow-up (difference 3.39, P = .02). CVD risk decreased in both groups without a significant difference between study arms. CONCLUSION A simple transactional decision aid based on calculating absolute individual CVD risk and promoting shared decision making in CVD prevention can be disseminated through CME groups and may lead to higher patient satisfaction and involvement and less decisional regret, without negatively affecting global CVD risk.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 227
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Z ALLG MED, DOI DOI 10.1055/S-2005-872475
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Evidence-based patient choice. Inevitable or impossible?
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, DIFFUSIONS INNOVATIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], Z MED PSYCHOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Evidence- based Patient Choice: Inevitable or Impossible?
[6]  
Baigent C, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V324, P71, DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
[7]   Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins [J].
Baigent, C ;
Keech, A ;
Kearney, PM ;
Blackwell, L ;
Buck, G ;
Pollicino, C ;
Kirby, A ;
Sourjina, T ;
Peto, R ;
Collins, R ;
Simes, J .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9493) :1267-1278
[8]  
Beauchamp TL., 1983, Principles of biomedical ethics, V2
[9]  
BENNETT C, 2007, INT SHAR DEC MAK C L, P88
[10]   Validation of a decision regret scale [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
O'Connor, AM ;
Wood, TJ ;
Hack, TF ;
Siminoff, L ;
Gordon, E ;
Feldman-Stewart, D .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) :281-292