Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): Finding the win-wins for energy, negative emissions and ecosystem services-size matters

被引:57
作者
Donnison, Caspar [1 ,2 ]
Holland, Robert A. [1 ]
Hastings, Astley [3 ]
Armstrong, Lindsay-Marie [4 ]
Eigenbrod, Felix [5 ]
Taylor, Gail [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Biol Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Univ Southampton, Sch Engn, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2020年 / 12卷 / 08期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
BECCS; bioenergy crops; carbon capture and storage; climate change; ecosystem service; land-use change; negative emissions; trade-offs; LAND-USE CHANGE; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COOLING WATER; SOIL CARBON; CO2; CAPTURE; BIOMASS; CROPS; MISCANTHUS;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12695
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) features heavily in the energy scenarios designed to meet the Paris Agreement targets, but the models used to generate these scenarios do not address environmental and social implications of BECCS at the regional scale. We integrate ecosystem service values into a land-use optimization tool to determine the favourability of six potential UK locations for a 500 MW BECCS power plant operating on local biomass resources. Annually, each BECCS plant requires 2.33 Mt of biomass and generates 2.99 Mt CO(2)of negative emissions and 3.72 TWh of electricity. We make three important discoveries: (a) the impacts of BECCS on ecosystem services are spatially discrete, with the most favourable locations for UK BECCS identified at Drax and Easington, where net annual welfare values (from the basket of ecosystems services quantified) of 39 pound and 25 pound million were generated, respectively, with notably lower annual welfare values at Barrow (-6 pound million) and Thames (2 pound million); (b) larger BECCS deployment beyond 500 MW reduces net social welfare values, with a 1 GW BECCS plant at Drax generating a net annual welfare value of 19 pound million (a 50% decline compared with the 500 MW deployment), and a welfare loss at all other sites; (c) BECCS can be deployed to generate net welfare gains, but trade-offs and co-benefits between ecosystem services are highly site and context specific, and these landscape-scale, site-specific impacts should be central to future BECCS policy developments. For the United Kingdom, meeting the Paris Agreement targets through reliance on BECCS requires over 1 GW at each of the six locations considered here and is likely, therefore, to result in a significant welfare loss. This implies that an increased number of smaller BECCS deployments will be needed to ensure a win-win for energy, negative emissions and ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 604
页数:19
相关论文
共 142 条
[91]   The availability of land for perennial energy crops in Great Britain [J].
Lovett, Andrew ;
Suennenberg, Gilla ;
Dockerty, Trudie .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2014, 6 (02) :99-107
[92]   Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies [J].
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Pehl, Michaja ;
Arvesen, Anders ;
Gibon, Thomas ;
Bodirsky, Benjamin L. ;
de Boer, Harmen Sytze ;
Fricko, Oliver ;
Hejazi, Mohamad ;
Humpenoeder, Florian ;
Iyer, Gokul ;
Mima, Silvana ;
Mouratiadou, Ioanna ;
Pietzcker, Robert C. ;
Popp, Alexander ;
van den Berg, Maarten ;
van Vuuren, Detlef ;
Hertwich, Edgar G. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[93]   The role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage in meeting the climate mitigation challenge: A whole system perspective [J].
Mander, Sarah ;
Anderson, Kevin ;
Larkin, Alice ;
Gough, Clair ;
Vaughan, Naomi .
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 :6036-6043
[94]   Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK [J].
Mccalmont, Jon P. ;
Hastings, Astley ;
Mcnamara, Niall P. ;
Richter, Goetz M. ;
Robson, Paul ;
Donnison, Iain S. ;
Clifton-Brown, John .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2017, 9 (03) :489-507
[95]   Selling out on nature [J].
McCauley, Douglas J. .
NATURE, 2006, 443 (7107) :27-28
[96]   Flood footprint of the 2007 floods in the UK: The case of the Yorkshire and The Humber region [J].
Mendoza-Tinoco, David ;
Guan, Dabo ;
Zeng, Zhao ;
Xia, Yang ;
Serrano, Ana .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 168 :655-667
[97]   Potential impacts on ecosystem services of land use transitions to second-generation bioenergy crops in GB [J].
Milner, Suzanne ;
Holland, Robert A. ;
Lovett, Andrew ;
Sunnenberg, Gilla ;
Hastings, Astley ;
Smith, Pete ;
Wang, Shifeng ;
Taylor, Gail .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (02) :317-333
[98]   Valuation of ecosystem services in alternative bioenergy landscape scenarios [J].
Mishra, Shruti K. ;
Negri, Maria Cristina ;
Kozak, Justin ;
Cacho, Julian F. ;
Quinn, John ;
Secchi, Silvia ;
Ssegane, Herbert .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2019, 11 (06) :748-762
[100]   Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals [J].
Nerini, Francesco Fuso ;
Tomei, Julia ;
To, Long Seng ;
Bisaga, Iwona ;
Parikh, Priti ;
Black, Mairi ;
Borrion, Aiduan ;
Spataru, Catalina ;
Broto, Vanesa Castan ;
Anandarajah, Gabrial ;
Milligan, Ben ;
Mulugetta, Yacob .
NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (01) :10-15