Disproportionate Proximity to Environmental Health Hazards: Methods, Models, and Measurement

被引:138
作者
Chakraborty, Jayajit [1 ]
Maantay, Juliana A. [2 ]
Brender, Jean D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Geog, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] CUNY, Lehman Coll, Dept Environm Geog & Geol Sci, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Rural Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, College Stn, TX USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY; AMBIENT AIR TOXICS; NEW-YORK-CITY; EQUITY ANALYSIS; POTENTIAL EXPOSURE; INDUSTRIAL SOURCES; CHEMICAL RELEASES; RACIAL-INEQUALITY; JUSTICE ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2010.300109
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We sought to provide a historical overview of methods, models, and data used in the environmental justice (EJ) research literature to measure proximity to environmental hazards and potential exposure to their adverse health effects. We explored how the assessment of disproportionate proximity and exposure has evolved from comparing the prevalence of minority or low-income residents in geographic entities hosting pollution sources and discrete buffer zones to more refined techniques that use continuous distances, pollutant fate-and-transport models, and estimates of health risk from toxic exposure. We also reviewed analytical techniques used to determine the characteristics of people residing in areas potentially exposed to environmental hazards and emerging geostatistical techniques that are more appropriate for EJ analysis than conventional statistical methods. We concluded by providing several recommendations regarding future research and data needs for EJ assessment that would lead to more reliable results and policy solutions. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:S27-S36. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.300109)
引用
收藏
页码:S27 / S36
页数:10
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   ENVIRONMENTAL EQUITY - THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF DUMPING [J].
ANDERTON, DL ;
ANDERSON, AB ;
OAKES, JM ;
FRASER, MR .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1994, 31 (02) :229-248
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, TOXIC WASTES RACE US
[4]  
[Anonymous], TOX WAST RAC 20 1987
[5]  
Anselin L, 1998, STAT TEXTB MONOG, V155, P237
[6]  
Anselin L., 2005, EXPLORING SPATIAL DA, DOI [10.1080/03461238.1963.10410606, DOI 10.1111/J.1435-5957.2010.00279.X/FULL]
[7]   Socioeconomic and racial disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in Maryland [J].
Apelberg, BJ ;
Buckley, TJ ;
White, RH .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (06) :693-699
[8]  
Ash M, 2004, SOC SCI Q, V78, P793, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502011.x
[9]   Few and far between? An environmental equity analysis of the geographic distribution of hazardous waste generation [J].
Atlas, M .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 83 (01) :365-378
[10]   The locality of waste sites within the city of Chicago: a demographic, social, and economic analysis [J].
Baden, BM ;
Coursey, DL .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2002, 24 (1-2) :53-93