Mexican Validation of the Engagement and Disaffection in Physical Education Scale

被引:6
作者
Rodriguez-Medellin, Rene [1 ]
Zamarripa, Jorge [1 ]
Marentes-Castillo, Maria [1 ]
Otero-Saborido, Fernando [2 ]
Banos, Raul [3 ]
Morquecho-Sanchez, Raquel [1 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Nuevo Leon, Fac Sports Org Cd Univ, Cd Univ S-N, San Nicolas De Los Garza 66451, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[2] Pablo de Olavide Univ, Fac Sports Sci Ctra Utrera, Ctra Utrera 1, Seville 41013, Spain
[3] Autonomous Univ Baja California, Fac Sports, Campus Ensenada Paseo Playa,Carlos Pacheco 7, Ensenada 22890, Baja California, Mexico
关键词
engagement; disaffection; physical education; invariance; gender; Mexico; OF-FIT INDEXES; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; MOTIVATION; PERFORMANCE; TEACHERS; SUPPORT; BURNOUT; MODEL; PEER;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17061821
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To date, no instrument adapted and validated that measures engagement and disaffection in the physical education class has been found, which limits the generation of knowledge of this area in Mexico. The aims of this study were to translate and adapt the engagement and disaffection scale to the context of physical education in Mexico and to examine its reliability, structure (two and four factors), and factorial invariance by gender in Mexican fifth- and sixth-grade elementary school students. A total of 1470 students participated (50.6% boys) with ages between 10 and 14 years (mean (M) = 10.56; standard deviation (SD) = 0.77) from federal (89.3%) and state (10.7%) elementary schools. Two factorial structures were tested (with four factors and two factors). The fit indexes of both models were satisfactory, and the factorial saturations were significant. The differences between the fit indexes of both models were irrelevant; therefore, the two-factor model was considered more suitable. The total strict invariance by gender was confirmed, and the reliabilities of the engagement and disaffection scale were acceptable. The Mexican version of the course engagement and disaffection scale in physical education is valid and useful to measure these constructs in the context of physical education in Mexico.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Alrashidi O., 2016, INT ED STUDIES, V9, P41, DOI [10.5539/ies.v9n12p41, DOI 10.5539/IES.V9N12P41]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10072581
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, J HAPPINESS STUD, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1015630930326
  • [4] Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
    Appleton, James J.
    Christenson, Sandra L.
    Furlong, Michael J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2008, 45 (05) : 369 - 386
  • [5] Student engagement and performance: A weekly diary study on the role of openness
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    Vergel, Ana Isabel Sanz
    Kuntze, Jeroen
    [J]. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2015, 39 (01) : 49 - 62
  • [6] Individual and Instructional Determinants of Student Engagement in Physical Education
    Bevans, Katherine
    Fitzpatrick, Leslie-Anne
    Sanchez, Betty
    Forrest, Christopher B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 29 (04) : 399 - 416
  • [7] PE Teacher and Classmate Support in Level of Physical Activity: The Role of Sex and BMI Status in Adolescents from Kosovo
    Bronikowski, Michal
    Bronikowska, Malgorzata
    Laudanska-Krzeminska, Ida
    Kantanista, Adam
    Morina, Besnik
    Vehapi, Shemsedin
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [8] Brophy J., 2004, MOTIVATING STUDENTS, V2nd, P434
  • [9] Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance
    Chen, Fang Fang
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) : 464 - 504
  • [10] Expanding Autonomy Psychological Need States From Two (Satisfaction, Frustration) to Three (Dissatisfaction): A Classroom-Based Intervention Study
    Cheon, Sung Hyeon
    Reeve, Johnmarshall
    Lee, Youngsun
    Ntoumanis, Nikos
    Gillet, Nicolas
    Kim, Bo Ram
    Song, Yong-Gwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 111 (04) : 685 - 702