Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication

被引:135
作者
Naik, Aanand D. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Kallen, Michael A. [3 ]
Walder, Annette [1 ,5 ]
Street, Richard L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Sect Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Sect Geriatr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gen Internal Med, Houston, TX USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Commun, College Stn, TX USA
[5] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Houston Ctr Qual Care & Utilizat Studies, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
hypertension; diabetes mellitus; physician-patient relations; outcomes assessment; goals;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Communication between patients and clinicians using collaborative goals and treatment plans may overcome barriers to achieving hypertension control in routine diabetes mellitus care. We assessed the interrelation of patient-clinician communication factors to determine their independent associations with hypertension control in diabetes care. Methods and Results-We identified 566 older adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension at the DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston, Tex. Clinical and pharmacy data were collected, and a patient questionnaire was sent to all participants. A total of 212 individuals returned surveys. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of patient characteristics, self-management behaviors, and communication factors on hypertension control. Three communication factors had significant associations with hypertension control. Two factors, patients' endorsement of a shared decision-making style (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.57) and proactive communication with one's clinician about abnormal results of blood pressure self-monitoring (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.26), had direct, independent associations in multivariate regression. Path analysis was used to investigate the direct and indirect effects of communication factors and hypertension control. Decision-making style (beta=0.20, P < 0.01) and proactive communication (beta= 0.50, P < 0.0001) again demonstrated direct effects on hypertension control. A third factor, clinicians' use of collaborative communication when setting treatment goals, had a total effect on hypertension control of 0.16 ( P < 0.05) through its direct effects on decision-making style (beta=0.28, P < 0.001) and proactive communication (beta=0.22, P < 0.01). Conclusions-Three communication factors were found to have significant associations with hypertension control. Patient - clinician communication that facilitates collaborative blood pressure goals and patients' input related to the progress of treatment may improve rates of hypertension control in diabetes care independent of medication adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:1361 / 1368
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease [J].
Atkinson M.J. ;
Sinha A. ;
Hass S.L. ;
Colman S.S. ;
Kumar R.N. ;
Brod M. ;
Rowland C.R. .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2 (1)
[2]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[3]   Hypertension management in patients with diabetes - The need for more aggressive therapy [J].
Berlowitz, DR ;
Ash, AS ;
Hickey, EC ;
Glickman, M ;
Friedman, R ;
Kader, B .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (02) :355-359
[4]   Barriers to hypertension control [J].
Borzecki, AM ;
Oliveria, SA ;
Berlowitz, DR .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 149 (05) :785-794
[5]   Improving blood pressure control by tailored feedback to patients and clinicians [J].
Bosworth, HB ;
Olsen, MK ;
Oddone, EZ .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 149 (05) :795-803
[6]   An evidence-based review of patient-centered behavioral interventions for hypertension [J].
Boulware, LE ;
Daumit, GL ;
Frick, KD ;
Minkovitz, CS ;
Lawrence, RS ;
Powe, NR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 21 (03) :221-232
[7]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[8]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[9]   What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? [J].
Deber, RB ;
Kraetschmer, N ;
Irvine, J .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (13) :1414-1420
[10]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619