Studying the effects of intervention programmes on household energy saving behaviours using graphical causal models

被引:29
作者
Bhushan, Nitin [1 ]
Steg, Linda [1 ]
Albers, Casper [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Heymans Inst Psychol Res, Fac Behav & Social Sci, Grote Kruisstr 2-1, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Causality; Intervention evaluation; Graphical causal models; Directed acyclic graphs; Confounding; Collider bias; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Randomised controlled trials are strongly advocated to evaluate the effects of intervention programmes on household energy saving behaviours. While randomised controlled trials are the ideal, in many cases, they are not feasible. Notably, many intervention studies rely on voluntary participation of households in the intervention programme, in which case random selection and random assignment are seriously challenged. Moreover, studies employing randomised controlled trials typically do not study the underlying processes causing behaviour change. Yet, the latter is highly important to improve theory and practice. We propose a systematic approach to causal inference based on graphical causal models to study effects of intervention programmes on household energy saving behaviours when randomised controlled trials are not feasible. Using a simple example, we explain why such an approach not only provides a formal tool to accurately establish effects of intervention programmes, but also enables a better understanding of the processes underlying behaviour change.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation [J].
Abrahamse, W ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C ;
Rothengatter, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :273-291
[2]   Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson's paradox [J].
Albers, Casper J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (50) :E6828-E6829
[3]   Behavior and Energy Policy [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Mullainathan, Sendhil .
SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5970) :1204-1205
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, DOI [10.1007/s41060-016-0038-6, DOI 10.1007/S41060-016-0038-6]
[5]   Some Problems with Randomized Controlled Trials and Some Viable Alternatives [J].
Carey, Timothy A. ;
Stiles, William B. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 23 (01) :87-95
[6]   Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider [J].
Cole, Stephen R. ;
Platt, Robert W. ;
Schisterman, Enrique F. ;
Chu, Haitao ;
Westreich, Daniel ;
Richardson, David ;
Poole, Charles .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (02) :417-420
[7]  
Deaton A., 2016, 22595 NAT BUR EC RES, DOI [10.3386/w22595, DOI 10.3386/W22595]
[8]   Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable [J].
Elwert, Felix ;
Winship, Christopher .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 40, 2014, 40 :31-53
[9]  
Elwert Felix, 2013, Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, P245, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_13, 10.1007/978-94-007-6094-313, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6094-313, 10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_13]
[10]   Evaluating energy behavior change programs using randomized controlled trials: Best practice guidelines for policymakers [J].
Frederiks, Elisha R. ;
Stenner, Karen ;
Hobman, Elizabeth V. ;
Fischle, Mark .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 22 :147-164