Multinational Corporations and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations

被引:8
作者
Alazzawi, Shireen [1 ]
机构
[1] Santa Clara Univ, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION; DIRECT FOREIGN-INVESTMENT; DOMESTIC FIRMS; SPILLOVERS; TRADE; ENTERPRISES; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1086/658350
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether foreign direct investment (FDI) by a multinational corporation (MNC) increases the likelihood that knowledge about new technologies and production processes will be exchanged between foreign and domestic firms.1 In recent years, many economies have striven to attract foreign direct investment by offering tax breaks and other financial incentives.2 Governments have justified this by arguing that FDI will be an important channel for the diffusion of knowledge to domestic firms, in addition to bringing about employment opportunities, transfer of skills, increased competition, and market access effects (Görg and Greenaway 2004). Surprisingly, there have been few studies that tackle the question of whether FDI facilitates knowledge flows. In fact, even the broader benefits that are supposed to be brought in by FDI to developing countries, such as higher productivity of domestic firms, do not seem to be materializing, with many researchers finding that FDI has a negative effect on the host economies (Haddad and Harrison 1993; Borensztein, De Gregorio, and Lee 1998; Aitken and Harrison 1999; Xu 2000). Developed countries, on the other hand, have another potential risk to worry about with respect to FDI: the possible erosionof their technological advantage due to the establishment of listening posts" by foreign companies to tap into their technological base. © 2011 by The University of Chicago."
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 680
页数:32
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NBER PATENT CITATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, WORLD INV REP TRANSN
[4]  
BARRO R, 2000, 42 HARV U CTR INT DE
[5]   FOREIGN-INVESTMENT AND PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY - THE CASE OF MEXICO [J].
BLOMSTROM, M .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 35 (01) :97-110
[6]   FOREIGN-INVESTMENT AND SPILLOVER EFFICIENCY IN AN UNDERDEVELOPED ECONOMY - EVIDENCE FROM THE MEXICAN MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRY [J].
BLOMSTROM, M ;
PERSSON, H .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1983, 11 (06) :493-501
[7]   How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? [J].
Borensztein, E ;
De Gregorio, J ;
Lee, JW .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 45 (01) :115-135
[8]   Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States [J].
Branstetter, L .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 68 (02) :325-344
[9]  
Branstetter Lee, 2000, FOREIGN DIRECT INVES, P113
[10]   Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the US and Japan [J].
Branstetter, LG .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 53 (01) :53-79