Risk-based approach in the revised European Union drinking water legislation: Opportunities for bioanalytical tools

被引:36
作者
Dingemans, Milou M. L. [1 ]
Baken, Kirsten A. [1 ]
van der Oost, Ron [2 ]
Schriks, Merijn [3 ]
van Wezel, Annemarie P. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] KWR Watercycle Res Inst, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Waternet Inst Urban Water Cycle, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vitens Drinking Water Co, Zwolle, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Effect-based monitoring (EBM); Effect-based trigger values (EBT); Chemical water quality; Mixtures; Health risk; IN-VITRO BIOASSAYS; ESTROGENIC ACTIVITY; SURFACE-WATER; WASTE-WATER; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; TRIGGER VALUES; ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS; SAMPLE PREPARATION; STRESS-RESPONSE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.4096
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A plethora of in vitro bioassays are developed in the context of chemical risk assessment and clinical diagnostics to test effects on different biological processes. Such assays can also be implemented in effect-based monitoring (EBM) of (drinking) water quality alongside chemical analyses. Effects-based monitoring can provide insight into risks for the environment and human health associated with exposure to (unknown) complex, low-level mixtures of micropollutants, which fits in the risk-based approach that was recently introduced in the European Drinking Water Directive. Some challenges remain, in particular those related to selection and interpretation of bioassays. For water quality assessment, carcinogenesis, adverse effects on reproduction and development, effects on xenobiotic metabolism, modulation of hormone systems, DNA reactivity, and adaptive stress responses are considered the most relevant toxicological endpoints. An evaluation procedure of the applicability and performance of in vitro bioassays for water quality monitoring, based on existing information, has been developed, which can be expanded with guidelines for experimental evaluations. In addition, a methodology for the interpretation of in vitro monitoring data is required, because the sensitivity of specific in vitro bioassays in combination with sample concentration may lead to responses of chemicals (far) below exposure concentrations that are relevant for human health effects. Different approaches are proposed to derive effect-based trigger values (EBTs), including EBTs based on (1) relative ecotoxicity potency, (2) health-based threshold values for chronic exposure in humans and kinetics of reference chemicals, and (3) read-across from (drinking) water guideline values. Effects-based trigger values need to be chosen carefully in order to be sufficiently but not overly conservative to indicate potential health effects. Consensus on the crucial steps in the selection and interpretation of in vitro bioassay data will facilitate implementation and legal embedding in the context of water quality monitoring of such assays in EBM strategies. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;15:126-134. (c) 2018 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 134
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [11] [Anonymous], 2007, TOXICITY TESTING 21, DOI DOI 10.17226/11970
  • [12] [Anonymous], 2015, SELECTION CRITERIA S
  • [13] [Anonymous], USITC PUBL
  • [14] Toxicological risk assessment and prioritization of drinking water relevant contaminants of emerging concern
    Baken, Kirsten A.
    Sjerps, Rosa M. A.
    Schriks, Merijn
    van Wezel, Annemarie P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 118 : 293 - 303
  • [15] In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making
    Bell, Shannon M.
    Chang, Xiaoqing
    Wambaugh, John F.
    Allen, David G.
    Bartels, Mike
    Brouwer, Kim L. R.
    Casey, Warren M.
    Choksi, Neepa
    Ferguson, Stephen S.
    Fraczkiewicz, Grazyna
    Jarabek, Annie M.
    Ke, Alice
    Lumen, Annie
    Lynn, Scott G.
    Paini, Alicia
    Price, Paul S.
    Ring, Caroline
    Simon, Ted W.
    Sipes, Nisha S.
    Sprankle, Catherine S.
    Strickland, Judy
    Troutman, John
    Wetmore, Barbara A.
    Kleinstreuer, Nicole C.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2018, 47 : 213 - 227
  • [16] Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources
    Brack, Werner
    Dulio, Valeria
    Agerstrand, Marlene
    Allan, Ian
    Altenburger, Rolf
    Brinkmann, Markus
    Bunke, Dirk
    Burgess, Robert M.
    Cousins, Ian
    Escher, Beate I.
    Hernandez, Felix J.
    Hewitt, L. Mark
    Hilscherova, Klara
    Hollender, Juliane
    Hollert, Henner
    Kase, Robert
    Klauer, Bernd
    Lindim, Claudia
    Herraez, David Lopez
    Miege, Cecil
    Munthe, John
    O'Toole, Simon
    Posthuma, Leo
    Ruedel, Heinz
    Schaefer, Ralf B.
    Sengl, Manfred
    Smedes, Foppe
    van de Meent, Dik
    van den Brink, Paul J.
    van Gils, Jos
    van Wezel, Annemarie P.
    Vethaak, A. Dick
    Vermeirssen, Etienne
    von der Ohe, Peter C.
    Vrana, Branislav
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 576 : 720 - 737
  • [17] Trigger values for investigation of hormonal activity in drinking water and its sources using CALUX bioassays
    Brand, Walter
    de Jongh, Cindy M.
    van der Linden, Sander C.
    Mennes, Wim
    Puijker, Leo M.
    van Leeuwen, Cornelis J.
    van Wezel, Annemarie P.
    Schriks, Merijn
    Heringa, Minne B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 55 : 109 - 118
  • [18] Micropollutants in European rivers: A mode of action survey to support the development of effect-based tools for water monitoring
    Busch, Wibke
    Schmidt, Susanne
    Kuehne, Ralph
    Schulze, Tobias
    Krauss, Martin
    Altenburger, Rolf
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2016, 35 (08) : 1887 - 1899
  • [19] Comparison of in vitro estrogenic activity and estrogen concentrations in source and treated waters from 25 US drinking water treatment plants
    Conley, Justin M.
    Evans, Nicola
    Mash, Heath
    Rosenblum, Laura
    Schenck, Kathleen
    Glassmeyer, Susan
    Furlong, Ed T.
    Kolpin, Dana W.
    Wilson, Vickie S.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 579 : 1610 - 1617
  • [20] Bioassay battery interlaboratory investigation of emerging contaminants in spiked water extracts - Towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring
    Di Paolo, Carolina
    Ottermanns, Richard
    Keiter, Steffen
    Ait-Aissa, Selim
    Bluhm, Kerstin
    Brack, Werner
    Breitholtz, Magnus
    Buchinger, Sebastian
    Carere, Mario
    Chalon, Carole
    Cousin, Xavier
    Dulio, Valeria
    Escher, Beate I.
    Hamers, Timo
    Hilscherova, Klara
    Jarque, Sergio
    Jonas, Adam
    Maillot-Marechal, Emmanuelle
    Marneffe, Yves
    Mai Thao Nguyen
    Pandard, Pascal
    Schifferli, Andrea
    Schulze, Tobias
    Seidensticker, Sven
    Seiler, Thomas-Benjamin
    Tang, Janet
    van der Oost, Ron
    Vermeirssen, Etienne
    Zounkova, Radka
    Zwart, Nick
    Hollert, Henner
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 104 : 473 - 484