Optimization design of key parameters for bioretention cells with mixed filter media via HYDRUS-1D model and regression analysis

被引:22
作者
Li, Jiake [1 ]
Liu, Zhouli [1 ]
Jiang, Chunbo [1 ]
Li, Yajiao [2 ]
Li, Huaien [1 ]
Xia, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Ecohydraul Northwest Arid Reg China, Xian 710048, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bioretention; Optimization; HYDRUS-1D; Response surface methodology; PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; LID-BMPS; PERFORMANCE; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106206
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The structural design of bioretention cells (BRCs) is important for stormwater flood control and pollutant removal. How to determine the key parameters and their values that affect the operation effect of facilities is a key problem to be solved. Synthetic storm experiments were monitored and analyzed to determine these regulation effects. The BRC with filler of BSM (Bioretention soil media) +10% fly ash showed excellent water reduction rate and event mean concentration (EMC) removal rate. BSM was the mixture of sand, soil and wood chips, and the ratio was 65:30:5 by mass. Based on the experimental data, the sensitivity of model parameters in Hydrus-1D was defined by using the Morris classification screening method. The key hydrological and water quality parameters were calibrated and validated with a determination coefficient R-2 above 0.6 and a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient NSE above 0.5. The key structure parameters in BRCs were optimized by using the calibrated HYDRUS-1D model and the response surface methodology (RSM). Results show that the BRC with the filler of BSM + 10% fly ash has the smallest optimized thickness of the filler layer, while the BRC with the filler of BSM + 10% green zeolite is the largest, and the difference between the two media combination is 16-26 cm. The design return period and the confluence ratio affect the design water volume jointly. Under the three-year design return period, the confluence ratios of five kinds of filling combinations (BSM + 10% WTR, BSM + 10% fly ash, soil, BSM, BSM + 10% green zeolite) are recommended to be <= 20:1, 20:1, 15:1, 15:1 and 10:1 respectively
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Enhancement of Groundwater-Level Prediction Using an Integrated Machine Learning Model Optimized by Whale Algorithm [J].
Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ;
Ehteram, Mohammad ;
Ahmed, Ali Najah ;
Teo, Fang Yenn ;
Fai, Chow Ming ;
Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin ;
Sapitang, Michelle ;
El-Shafie, Ahmed .
NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (05) :3233-3252
[2]  
Cheng D, 2018, METEOROL ENV SCI, V1, P132
[3]   Assessing cost-effectiveness of specific LID practice designs in response to large storm events [J].
Chui, Ting Fong May ;
Liu, Xin ;
Zhan, Wenting .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 533 :353-364
[4]   Hydrologic performance of bioretention in an expressway service area [J].
Gao, Jianping ;
Pan, Junkui ;
Hu, Ning ;
Xie, Chengzuo .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 77 (07) :1829-1837
[5]  
[高建平 Gao Jianping], 2017, [水科学进展, Advances in Water Science], V28, P702
[6]  
Hao G.Y., 2018, J HYDROELECTRIC ENG, V12, P56
[7]  
[贺文彦 He Wenyan], 2018, [环境科学学报, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae], V38, P1586
[8]   LID-BMPs planning for urban runoff control and the case study in China [J].
Jia, Haifeng ;
Yao, Hairong ;
Tang, Ying ;
Yu, Shaw L. ;
Field, Richard ;
Tafuri, Anthony N. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 149 :65-76
[9]   Design parameters and treatment efficiency of a retrofit bioretention system on runoff nitrogen removal [J].
Jiang, Chun-bo ;
Li, Jia-ke ;
Zhang, Bin-hong ;
Ruan, Tian-shun ;
Li, Huai-en ;
Dong, Wen .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (33) :33298-33308
[10]   Phosphorus removal of retrofit bioretention systems on urban surface runoff [J].
Jiang, Chunbo ;
Li, Jiake ;
Zhang, Binhong ;
Li, Huaien .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 126 :239-247