Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: what about in Europe?

被引:0
作者
Scurria, Serena [1 ]
Asmundo, Alessio [1 ]
Gualniera, Patrizia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Dept Biomed & Dent Sci & Morphofunct Imaging, Sect Legal Med, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Messina, Italy
关键词
Euthanasia; Assisted suicide; Legal liability; Europe; OF-LIFE PRACTICES; CHILDREN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.23736/S0393-3660.19.04076-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: End-of-life legislation, because of its bioethical, medico-legal, and judicial implications, is heatedly disputed in Europe and throughout the world, engendering a variety of legal end-of-life care options in different countries. We thought it could be interesting to compare the Italian law with current European legislation regulating end-of-life matters. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the Medline, Cochrane Central, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases was conducted using the search words: "euthanasia", "law", "Europe", and "assisted suicide". The search word "euthanasia" was entered singly or in combination with each of the other search terms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: To date, only three countries in Europe (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) have legalized euthanasia, and four countries (Switzerland, France, Austria, Germany) permit only assisted suicide. Acceptance by the general public of euthanasia and assisted suicide increased in 11 of 13 European countries between 1981 and 2008, in parallel with a decrease in religiosity (except for Italy and Holland) and an increase in secularization. There was also a trend toward a correlation between an increase of the value of self-determination in important life issues and an increase in acceptance of euthanasia. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that end-of-life decisions constitute a challenge for political governance and bioethical deliberation in modern liberal democracies. It appears that in certain situations, euthanasia is perceived more as a means to reduce health care costs rather than an ethical question regarding self-determination.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 900
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Beyond cultural stereotyping: views on end-of-life decision making among religious and secular persons in the USA, Germany, and Israel
    Schweda, Mark
    Schicktanz, Silke
    Raz, Aviad
    Silvers, Anita
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 18
  • [22] Determinants of acceptance of end-of-life interventions: a comparison between withdrawing life-prolonging treatment and euthanasia in Austria
    Stolz, Erwin
    Grossschaedl, Franziska
    Mayerl, Hannes
    Rasky, Eva
    Freidl, Wolfgang
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 16
  • [23] End-of-life practices in the Netherlands under The Euthanasia Act
    van der Heide, Agnes
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
    Rurup, Mette L.
    Buiting, Hilde M.
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    Hanssen-de Wolf, Johanna E.
    Janssen, Anke G. J. M.
    Pasman, H. Roeline W.
    Rietjens, Judith A. C.
    Prins, Cornelis J. M.
    Deerenberg, Ingeborg M.
    Gevers, Joseph K. M.
    van der Maas, Paul J.
    van der Wal, Gerrit
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (19) : 1957 - 1965
  • [24] Neonatal euthanasia: Lessons from the Groningen Protocol
    Verhagen, A. A. Eduard
    [J]. SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 19 (05) : 296 - 299
  • [25] Continuous sedation until death. A French way for the end-of-life care?
    Zittoun, Robert
    [J]. PRESSE MEDICALE, 2016, 45 (7-8): : 670 - 675
  • [26] 2012, REV ESP SALUD PUBLIC, V86, P1