Variation in the morphology of the wings of the endangered grass-feeding butterfly Coenonympha oedippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in response to contrasting habitats

被引:15
作者
Jugovic, Jure [1 ]
Zupan, Sara [1 ]
Buzan, Elena [1 ]
Celik, Tatjana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Primorska, Fac Math Nat Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Biodivers, Koper 6000, Slovenia
[2] Slovenian Acad Sci & Arts, Res Ctr, Novi Trg 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
Lepidoptera; Nymphalidae; butterfly; Coenonympha oedippus; False Ringlet; wing; adaptation; classical morphometrics; geometric morphometrics; environmental heterogeneity; SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; FLIGHT MORPHOLOGY; LIFE-HISTORY; BODY-SIZE; REACTION NORMS; HOST-PLANTS; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; PATTERN;
D O I
10.14411/eje.2018.034
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
At the southern limit of its range the endangered butterfly Coenonympha oedippus inhabits grasslands (wet, dry) that differ significantly in the abundance of its larval hostplants (wet > dry) and mean annual air temperature (wet < dry). We determined the difference in the wing morphology of individuals in the two contrasting habitats to test whether and how traits associated with wing size, shape and eye like spots vary in the sexes and two ecotypes. We show that sexual dimorphism follows the same (wing size and shape, number of eyespots on forewing) or different (relative area of eyespots on hindwings) patterns in the two contrasting habitats. Irrespective of ecotype, females had larger, longer and narrower wings, and more forewing eyespots than males. Sexual dimorphism in the relative area of eyespots on hindwing was female-biased in the wet, but male-biased in the dry ecotype. Ecotype dimorphism in wing size and the relative area of eyespots on the hindwing is best explained by mean annual air temperature and abundance of host-plants. While ecotype dimorphism in wing size did not differ between sexes, neither in direction (wet > dry) or in degree, in the two sexes the relative area of eyespots on hindwing had opposite patterns (males: dry > wet; females: wet > dry) and was more pronounced in males than in females. The differences in wing shape between ecotypes were detected only in the hindwings of males, with more rounded apex in the dry than in the wet ecotype. We discuss the life-history traits, behavioural strategies and selection mechanisms, which largely account for the sex- and ecotype-specific variation in wing morphology.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 353
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Abramoff M.D., 2004, Biophotonics Int., V11, P36
[2]   Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution' [J].
Adams, DC ;
Rohlf, FJ ;
Slice, DE .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2004, 71 (01) :5-16
[3]   A geometric morphometric study of the wing shapes of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions: An environmental and distance-based consideration [J].
Bai, Yi ;
Bin Ma, Li ;
Xu, Sheng-Quan ;
Wang, Gui-Hu .
FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 2015, 98 (01) :162-169
[4]   On the sex-specific mechanisms of butterfly flight:: flight performance relative to flight morphology, wing kinematics, and sex in Pararge aegeria [J].
Berwaerts, Koen ;
Aerts, Peter ;
Van Dyck, Hans .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2006, 89 (04) :675-687
[5]  
Bischof A., 1968, Mitteilungen aus der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel (N F), V18, P41
[6]  
Blest A. D., 1957, Behaviour, V11, P209, DOI 10.1163/156853956X00048
[7]  
Bonelli S, 2010, OEDIPPUS, V26, P25
[9]   High-Arctic butterflies become smaller with rising temperatures [J].
Bowden, Joseph J. ;
Eskildsen, Anne ;
Hansen, Rikke R. ;
Olsen, Kent ;
Kurle, Carolyn M. ;
Hoye, Toke T. .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 11 (10)
[10]  
BOZANO G. C., 2002, GUIDE BUTTERFLIES PA