Framing Renewable Energy: A Comparative Study of Newspapers in Australia and Sweden

被引:44
作者
Djerf-Pierre, Monika [1 ]
Cokley, John [2 ]
Kuchel, Louise J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Journalism Media & Commun, Box 710, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Humanities, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE | 2016年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
environmental journalism; framing; renewable energy; domestication; global journalism; comparative research; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NUCLEAR-POWER; NEWS MEDIA; COMMUNICATION; CONSTRUCTION; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1080/17524032.2015.1056542
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Australia and Sweden display very different institutional settings and contexts for the production of environmental journalism. This empirical study examined how two major quality newspapers in Sweden and Australia have framed renewable energy as an environmental, political, scientific, economic and civil society issue. A deductive, quantitative methodological approach was used to identify dominant frames and actors in articles in The Australian (Australia) and Dagens Nyheter (Sweden) between October 2010 and June 2011 2010/2011. The findings suggest that the attention given to different types of renewable energy in the two newspapers and how issues were framed was contingent on the domestication of the discussion of renewable energy in the two countries. Reporting on renewable energy in both newspapers was characterized by a focus on elite actors and economic frames, the absence of civil society frames and negative (The Australian) or ambiguous (Dagens Nyheter) environmental frames. The study extends our understanding of the contextual conditions that enable and limit journalists when reporting environmental issues.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 655
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条