Multiplexed immunobead-based cytokine profiling for early detection of ovarian cancer

被引:214
|
作者
Gorelik, E
Landsittel, DP
Marrangoni, AM
Modugno, F
Velikokhatnaya, L
Winans, MT
Bigbee, WL
Herberman, RB
Lokshin, AE
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Hillman Canc Ctr, Inst Canc, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Pathol & Immunol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0404
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Early detection of ovarian cancer might improve clinical outcome. Some studies have shown the role of cytokines as a new group of tumor markers for ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that a panel comprised of multiple cytokines, which individually may not show strong correlation with the disease, might provide higher diagnostic power. To evaluate the diagnostic utility of cytokine panel, we used a novel multianalyte LabMAP profiling technology that allows simultaneous measurement of multiple markers. Concentrations of 24 cytokines (cytokines/chemokines, growth, and angiogenic factors) in combination with cancer antigen-125 (CA-125), were measured in sera of 44 patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, 45 healthy women, and 37 patients with benign pelvic tumors. Six markers, i.e., interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, epidermal growth factor (EGF) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and CA-125, showed significant differences in serum concentrations between ovarian cancer and control groups. Out of this group, IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, EGF, and CA-125, were used in a classification tree analysis that resulted in 84% sensitivity at 95% specificity. The receiver operator characteristic curve created using the combination of markers produced sensitivities between 90% and 100% in the area of 80% to 90% specificity, whereas the receiver operator characteristic curve for CA-125 alone resulted in sensitivities of 70% to 80%. The classification tree analysis for discrimination of benign condition from ovarian cancer used CA-125, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), IL-6, EGF, and VEGF resulting in 86.5% sensitivity and 93.0% specificity. The presented data show that simultaneous testing of a panel of serum cytokines and CA-125 using LabMAP technology may present a promising approach for ovarian cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 987
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
    Nguyen, Long
    Cardenas-Goicoechea, Segundo Joel
    Gordon, Pierre
    Curtin, Christina
    Momeni, Mazdak
    Chuang, Linus
    Fishman, David
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 9 (02) : 171 - 187
  • [32] Ovarian cancer: feasibility of early detection
    Vessela Vassileva
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2009, 6 (7) : 375 - 375
  • [33] EPIC Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer
    Skates, Steven J.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (18) : 4542 - 4544
  • [34] DETECTION OF OVARIAN CANCER AT AN EARLY STAGE
    GRAHAM, RM
    SCHUELLE.EF
    GRAHAM, JB
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1965, 26 (02): : 151 - &
  • [35] FALLOPOSCOPE FOR EARLY OVARIAN CANCER DETECTION
    Galvez, Dominique
    Kiekens, Kelli
    Romano, Gabriella
    Santaniello, Steven
    Cordova, Ricky
    Barton, Jennifer K.
    LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 52 : S56 - S57
  • [36] Ovarian cancer screening and early detection
    Joyner, Andrea B.
    Runowicz, Carolyn D.
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 5 (06) : 693 - 699
  • [37] Early detection and screening for ovarian cancer
    Schwartz, PE
    Chambers, JT
    Taylor, KJ
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, : 233 - 237
  • [38] DETECTION OF EARLY OVARIAN-CANCER
    MELCHER, D
    LANCET, 1990, 336 (8712): : 436 - 436
  • [39] Ovarian cancer: challenges of early detection
    Usha Menon
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2007, 4 : 498 - 499
  • [40] Proteomic early detection of ovarian cancer
    Toma T.
    Genome Biology, 3 (1)