Pragmatism, neo-pragmatism and sociocultural theory - Communicative participation as a perspective in LIS

被引:57
作者
Sundin, O [1 ]
Johannisson, J
机构
[1] Univ Coll Boras, Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
epistemology; information searches; pragmatism;
D O I
10.1108/00220410510577998
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - To show that the neo-pragmatist position of Richard Rorty, when combined with a sociocultural perspective, provides library and information science (LIS) with a forceful epistemological tool. Design/methodology/approach - Literature-based conceptual analysis of. historical development of pragmatism in relation to other epistemological positions; neo-pragmatism as a non-dualist, both purpose and communication oriented, epistemology; and a sociocultural perspective within pedagogy, originated from the Russian researcher Lev Vygotsky. Findings - Brought together, a neo-pragmatist, sociocultural perspective contributes to a focus on people's actions through the use of linguistic and physical tools. As a tangible example of how neo-pragmatism. can be applied as an epistemological tool within LIS, information seeking seen as communicative participation is discussed. This article unites a perspective on information seeking as communicative participation with the neo-pragmatist concepts of "tools" and "communities of justification". The article is concluded by an assessment of neo-pragmatism as an epistemological position within LIS, including those research issues that arise from this position and that are introduced along the way. Practical implications - In its focus on usability, the neo-pragmatist position provides a possible bridge between academic and other professional practices in the field of LIS. Originality/value - Provides, through the means of neo-pragmatism, an argument for the necessity of epistemological argumentation within LIS.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 43
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Language and representation in information retrieval
[2]  
[Anonymous], DISCOURSE TOOLS REAS
[3]  
Bowker Geoffrey C., 1999, SORTING THINGS OUT C
[4]  
Brandom Robert., 2000, RORTY HIS CRITICS
[5]  
BROWN JS, 2000, SOCIAL LIFE INFORMAT
[6]  
Budd J.M., 2001, Knowledge and knowing in library and information science: A philosophical framework
[7]  
BURNETT G, 2000, INFORMATION RES, V5
[8]   The concept of information [J].
Capurro, R ;
Hjorland, B .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 :343-411
[9]  
CAPURRO R, 1992, CONCEPTIONS OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, P82
[10]  
Carey J.W., 1989, COMMUNICATION CULTUR