Developing a framework for assessing teaching effectiveness in higher education

被引:8
作者
Miguel, C., V [1 ]
Moreira, C. [1 ]
Alves, M. A. [1 ]
Campos, J. B. L. M. [1 ]
Glassey, J. [2 ]
Schaer, E. [3 ]
Kockmann, N. [4 ]
Kujundziski, A. Porjazoska [5 ]
Polakovic, M. [6 ]
Madeira, L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Porto, Portugal
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Lorraine, ENSIC LRGP, Nancy, France
[4] TU Dortmund Univ, Dortmund, Germany
[5] Int Balkan Univ, Skopje, Macedonia
[6] Slovak Univ Technol Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
关键词
Teaching efficiency; Pedagogical methodologies; Course assessment; ENGINEERING-EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ece.2019.06.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Evaluating the effectiveness of teaching and learning core knowledge outcomes and professional skills is a highly challenging task that has not yet been satisfactorily addressed at higher education level. The iTeach European project consortium developed a framework for assessing the effectiveness of various pedagogical methodologies in chemical engineering education, including those aiming to promote important core competencies related to employability, in a range of geographical and educational contexts. The framework was firstly implemented in a core chemical engineering area (reaction engineering) to check its usability and robustness, and subsequently was also tested on a range of subject areas from various branches of engineering and other disciplines, one of which is analysed in more detail in this contribution. The results of this broader assessment encompassed a much more diverse student body with varying educational experiences and a wider range of different teaching methodologies. The outcomes of this assessment are highlighted and the benefits of such an objective approach for evaluating teaching effectiveness is discussed. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Allan J., 2009, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, V21, P362
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CHEM ENG ED
[3]   Teaching Effectiveness, Course Evaluation, and Academic Performance: The Role of Academic Delay of Gratification [J].
Bembenutty, Hefer .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ACADEMICS, 2009, 20 (02) :326-355
[4]  
Burnett P., 2010, J VOCAT EDUC TRAIN, V51, P607, DOI [10.1080/13636829900200107, DOI 10.1080/13636829900200107]
[5]   Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning: The case of engineering [J].
Cabrera, AF ;
Colbeck, CL ;
Terenzini, PT .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2001, 42 (03) :327-352
[6]  
Chalmers D., 2007, A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and leaching
[7]  
Drucker P.F., 1992, Managing for the future
[8]   Trends in chemical engineering education: Process, product and sustainable chemical engineering challenges [J].
Favre, Eric ;
Falk, Veronique ;
Roizard, Christine ;
Schaer, Eric .
EDUCATION FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2008, 3 (01) :E22-E27
[9]  
Felder R.M., 2000, Chemical Engineering Education, V34, P198
[10]   Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a new era [J].
Fink, LD ;
Ambrose, S ;
Wheeler, D .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2005, 94 (01) :185-194