Reliability sensitivity method by line sampling

被引:169
作者
Lu, Zhenzhou [1 ]
Song, Shufang [1 ]
Yue, Zhufeng [2 ]
Wang, Jian [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Aeronaut, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Mech Civil Engn & Architecture, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Belfast BT9 5AH, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Reliability; Sensitivity; Line sampling; Failure probability;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.10.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Reliability sensitivity refers to the derivative of the failure probability with respect to the distribution parameter of basic random variable. Conventionally, this requires repetitive evaluations of the failure probability for different distribution parameters, which is a direct but computationally expensive task. Ail efficient simulation algorithm is presented to perform reliability sensitivity analysis using the line sampling technique, which gives a good failure probability evaluation for high-dimensional problems and still presents a comparative one for low-dimensional problems. Oil the basis of the line sampling procedure for failure probability analysis, the concept and implementation are presented for reliability sensitivity. It is shown that the desired information about reliability sensitivity can be obtained by a very limited increase of computation effort based oil the failure probability analysis by the line sampling technique. The presented reliability sensitivity algorithm is more efficient than the one based oil the direct Monte Carlo technique, especially for cases where the failure probability is low and the [lumber of random variables is large, which is illustrated by several examples. Additionally, limitations of the line sampling based reliability sensitivity method are demonstrated by a numerical example as well. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 532
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
[21]   Moment methods for structural reliability [J].
Zhao, YG ;
Ono, T .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2001, 23 (01) :47-75