Inter-agency comparison of TanDEM-X baseline solutions

被引:48
|
作者
Jaeggi, A. [1 ]
Montenbruck, O. [2 ]
Moon, Y. [3 ]
Wermuth, M. [2 ]
Koenig, R. [3 ]
Michalak, G. [3 ]
Bock, H. [1 ]
Bodenmann, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Astron Inst, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
[3] German Res Ctr Geosci, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
TanDEM-X; Precise baseline determination (PBD); Inter-agency baseline comparison; Ambiguity fixing; GPS; SAR; PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION; GPS RECEIVER; GRACE; ADJUSTMENT; RECOVERY; ANTENNAS; CHAMP; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2012.03.027
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
TanDEM-X (TerraSAR-X add-on for Digital Elevation Measurement) is the first Synthetic Aperture Radar (SA R) mission using close formation flying for bistatic SAR interferometry. The primary goal of the mission is to generate a global digital elevation model (DEM) with 2 m height precision and 10 m ground resolution from the configurable SAR interferometer with space baselines of a few hundred meters. As a key mission requirement for the interferometric SA R processing, the relative position, or baseline vector, of the two satellites must be determined with an accuracy of 1 mm (1D RMS) from GPS measurements collected by the onboard receivers. The operational baseline products for the TanDEM-X mission are routinely generated by the German Research Center for Geosciences (GFZ) and the German Space Operations Center (DLR/GSOC) using different software packages (EPOS/BSW, GHOST) and analysis strategies. For a further independent performance assessment, TanDEM-X baseline solutions are generated at the Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB) on a best effort basis using the Bernese Software (BSW). Dual-frequency baseline solutions are compared for a 1-month test period in January 2011. Differences of reduced-dynamic baseline solutions exhibit a representative standard deviation (STD) of 1 mm outside maneuver periods, while biases are below 1 mm in all directions. The achieved baseline determination performance is close to the mission specification, but independent SAR calibration data takes acquired over areas with a well known DEM from previous missions will be required to fully meet the 1 mm 1D RMS target. Besides the operational solutions, single-frequency baseline solutions are tested. They benefit from a more robust ambiguity fixing and show a slightly better agreement of below 1 mm STD, but are potentially affected by errors caused by an incomplete compensation of differential ionospheric path delays. (C) 2012 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 271
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi baseline SAR acquisition concepts and phase unwrapping algorithms for the TanDEM-X mission
    Lachaise, M.
    Eineder, M.
    Fritz, T.
    IGARSS: 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-12: SENSING AND UNDERSTANDING OUR PLANET, 2007, : 5272 - 5276
  • [22] Estimation of subcanopy topography based on single-baseline TanDEM-X InSAR data
    Huiqiang Wang
    Haiqiang Fu
    Jianjun Zhu
    Zhiwei Liu
    Bing Zhang
    Changcheng Wang
    Zhiwei Li
    Jun Hu
    Yanan Yu
    Journal of Geodesy, 2021, 95
  • [23] Long-Term Validation of TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X Orbit Solutions with Laser and Radar Measurements
    Hackel, Stefan
    Gisinger, Christoph
    Balss, Ulrich
    Wermuth, Martin
    Montenbruck, Oliver
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (05):
  • [24] Forest Height Inversion by Combining Single-Baseline TanDEM-X InSAR Data with External DTM Data
    He, Wenjie
    Zhu, Jianjun
    Lopez-Sanchez, Juan M.
    Gomez, Cristina
    Fu, Haiqiang
    Xie, Qinghua
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (23)
  • [25] TanDEM-X Performance: Impact on Acquisition Planning Optimization
    Kraus, T.
    Bachmann, M.
    Rizzoli, P.
    Braeutigam, B.
    Krieger, G.
    2012 13TH INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2012, : 371 - 375
  • [26] TROPICAL FOREST STRUCTURE OBSERVATION WITH TANDEM-X DATA
    Pulella, A.
    Bispo, P. C.
    Pardini, M.
    Kugler, F.
    Cazcarra, V.
    Tello, M.
    Papathanassiou, K.
    Balzter, H.
    Rizaev, I.
    Santos, M. N.
    dos Santos, J. R.
    Araujo, L. S.
    Tansey, K.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2017, : 918 - 921
  • [27] Comparison of Three Algorithms for the Evaluation of TanDEM-X Data for Gully Detection in Krumhuk Farm (Namibia)
    Orti, Miguel Vallejo
    Negussie, Kaleb
    Corral-Pazos-de-Provens, Eva
    Hoefle, Bernhard
    Bubenzer, Olaf
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [28] CHARACTERISTICS OF TANDEM-X EXPERIMENTAL MODES
    Bello, Jose Luis Bueso
    Gonzalez, Carolina
    Kraus, Thomas
    Braeutigam, Benjamin
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2012, : 1042 - 1045
  • [29] TANDEM-X COMMISSIONING PHASE STATUS
    Gonzalez, Jaime Hueso
    Bachmann, Markus
    Hofmann, Harald
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2010, : 2633 - 2635
  • [30] The bistatic aspect of the TanDEM-X mission
    Nies, Holger
    Loffeld, Otmar
    Natroshvili, Koba
    Kalkuhl, Marc
    IGARSS: 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-12: SENSING AND UNDERSTANDING OUR PLANET, 2007, : 631 - +