Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography

被引:147
作者
Nouri-Mahdavi, K [1 ]
Hoffman, D [1 ]
Tannenbaum, DP [1 ]
Law, SK [1 ]
Caprioli, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Glaucoma Div, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.004
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate performance of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of early glaucoma. DESIGN: Observational case-control study. METHODS: (Setting) under bar: University-based tertiary care center. (Study Population) under bar: One eye from 50 normals, 42 glaucoma suspects, and 59 early glaucoma patients meeting the following criteria: visual field (VF) mean deviation greater than or equal to-6.00 dB, age greater than or equal to40 years, spherical refractive error less than or equal to5 diopters, astigmatism less than or equal to3 diopters, and visual acuity greater than or equal to20/ 30. (Observation Procedure) under bar: Early glaucoma by VF (EGVF) was described as repeatable abnormal achromatic VFs based on predefined criteria. Glaucoma suspects (GS) were defined as presence of glaucomatous disk appearance with normal achromatic VFs. (Outcome Measures) under bar: Average nerve fiber layer thickness (NFLT) and NFLT in each of four quadrants and 12 clock-hour sectors. Receiver operating characteristic curves and sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the performance of OCT. RESULTS: Average NFLT was 128.4 +/- 15.4, 102.0 +/- 25.4, and 86.5 +/- 31.5 mum in normal, GS, and EGVF eyes, respectively. Normal eyes were different from both glaucoma groups (P <.001); NFLT in the superior quadrant and at the 11 o'clock position had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (.840 and .933) in the GS and EGVF groups (P =.03). The sensitivity of the OCT for detection of glaucoma was 71% and 85% for the GS and EGVF groups with specificity fixed at 90%. CONCLUSION: The OCT discriminates well between eyes with early perimetric glaucoma and normal eyes. However, its performance is less adequate in eyes with suspicious disk and normal VFs. (C) 2004 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 235
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Baumal C R, 1999, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V10, P182, DOI 10.1097/00055735-199906000-00006
  • [2] Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography
    Blumenthal, EZ
    Williams, JM
    Weinreb, RN
    Girkin, CA
    Berry, CC
    Zangwill, LM
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (12) : 2278 - 2282
  • [3] Bowd C, 2000, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V118, P22
  • [4] Bowd C, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, P1993
  • [5] Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes
    Carpineto, P
    Ciancaglini, M
    Zuppardi, E
    Falconio, G
    Doronzo, E
    Mastropasqua, L
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (01) : 190 - 195
  • [6] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [7] Greaney MJ, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P140
  • [8] Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes
    Guedes, V
    Schuman, JS
    Hertzmark, E
    Wollstein, G
    Correnti, A
    Mancini, R
    Lederer, D
    Voskanian, S
    Velazquez, L
    Pakter, HM
    Pedut-Kloizman, T
    Fujimoto, JG
    Mattox, C
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (01) : 177 - 189
  • [9] OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HUMAN RETINA
    HEE, MR
    IZATT, JA
    SWANSON, EA
    HUANG, D
    SCHUMAN, JS
    LIN, CP
    PULIAFITO, CA
    FUJIMOTO, JG
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 113 (03) : 325 - 332
  • [10] Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes
    Hoh, ST
    Greenfield, DS
    Mistlberger, A
    Liebmann, JM
    Ishikawa, H
    Ritch, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (02) : 129 - 135