Comparison of endothelial cell loss and surgically induced astigmatism following conventional extracapsular cataract surgery, manual small-incision surgery and phacoemulsification

被引:65
作者
George, R [1 ]
Rupauliha, P [1 ]
Sripriya, AV [1 ]
Rajesh, PS [1 ]
Vahan, PV [1 ]
Praveen, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Res Fdn Sankara Nethralaya, Jaslok Community Ophthalmol Ctr, Madras 600006, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
cataract surgery; endothelial cell loss; extracapsular cataract extraction; small-incision cataract surgery; surgically induced astigmatism; phacoemulsification; intraocular lens implantation;
D O I
10.1080/09286580591005778
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and endothelial cell loss following conventional extracapsular cataract surgery (ECCE), manual small-incision cataract surgery (Blumenthal technique)(SICS) and phacoemulsification (PE) with non-foldable intraocular lens implantation. Methods: 186 cataractous eyes with nuclear sclerosis grade 3 or less were randomized to undergo ECCE, SICS or PE with intraocular lens (non-foldable) implantation after a detailed pre-operative assessment. Keratometry and specular microscopy were performed pre-operatively and 6 weeks postoperatively. Surgically induced astigmatism was calculated using the rectangular coordinate method (Holladay et al.). Results: Mean endothelial cell loss was similar for all three groups (p = 0.855); ECCE induced a loss of 4.72% (SD: 13.07); SICS 4.21% (SD: 10.29) and PE 5.41% (SD: 10.99). Mean SIA was 1.77D (1.61D) for the ECCE group, 1.17D (0.95D) for the SICS group and 0.77D (0.65D) for the PE group (p = 0.001). The magnitude of the difference between the SICS and the PE group was OAD. Conclusion: PE induced less astigmatism than SICS and ECCE in this study but the magnitude of the difference between SICS and PE was small. There was no significant difference in endothelial cell loss between the three groups.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 297
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   THE GLIDING NUCLEUS [J].
BLUMENTHAL, M ;
ASHKENAZI, I ;
FOGEL, R ;
ASSIA, EI .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 19 (03) :435-437
[2]   Is manual small incision cataract surgery affordable in the developing countries? A cost comparison with extracapsular cataract extraction [J].
Gogate, PM ;
Deshpande, M ;
Wormald, RP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 87 (07) :843-846
[3]   Calculating endothelial cell loss - Reply [J].
Hayashi, K .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (01) :6-6
[4]   CALCULATING THE SURGICALLY INDUCED REFRACTIVE CHANGE FOLLOWING OCULAR SURGERY [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
CRAVY, TV ;
KOCH, DD .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 18 (05) :429-443
[5]  
Jaffe NS, 1990, CATARACT SURG ITS CO, V5th
[6]   Three year prospective, randomized evaluation of intraocular lens implantation through 3.2 and 5.5 mm incisions [J].
Oshika, T ;
Nagahara, K ;
Yaguchi, S ;
Emi, K ;
Takenaka, H ;
Tsuboi, S ;
Yoshitomi, F ;
Nagamoto, T ;
Kurosaka, D .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (04) :509-514
[7]   Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Indian eyes [J].
Rao, SK ;
Sen, PR ;
Fogla, R ;
Gangadharan, S ;
Padmanabhan, P ;
Badrinath, SS .
CORNEA, 2000, 19 (06) :820-823
[8]  
Resnikoff S, 2004, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V82, P844
[9]  
Thomas R, 2000, Indian J Ophthalmol, V48, P145
[10]   Results of small incision extracapsular cataract surgery using the anterior chamber maintainer without viscoelastic [J].
Wright, M ;
Chawla, H ;
Adams, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 83 (01) :71-75