Institutions, Ideology, and Nonideal Social Ontology

被引:10
作者
Brannmark, Johan [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ, Eth & Polit Philosophy, Dept Global Polit Studies, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
institutions; ideology; idealization; social ontology; FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL CONCEPTIONS; RACISM;
D O I
10.1177/0048393118823265
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Analytic social ontology has been dominated by approaches where institutions tend to come out paradigmatically as being relatively harmonious and mutually beneficial. This can however raise worries about such models potentially playing an ideological role in conceptualizing certain politically charged features of our societies as marginal phenomena or not even being institutional matters at all. This article seeks to develop a nonideal theory of institutions, which neither assumes that institutions are beneficial or oppressive, and where ideology is understood as a structuring and stabilizing phenomenon that helps maintain specific distributions of rights and duties by conferring perceived legitimacy onto them.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 159
页数:23
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Alexander M., 2010, NEW JIM CROW MASS IN
[2]  
Andersson Asa., 2007, Power and Social Ontology
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GRAMMAR SOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS SOCIAL SCI
[5]  
Brannmark Johan, 2018, ERKENNTNIS, DOI [10.1007/s10670-018-9994-7., DOI 10.1007/S10670-018-9994-7.]
[6]  
Conforti J., 2007, International Review of Modern Sociology, V33, P245
[7]  
Dewey John., 2014, Skillful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action, VFirst, P146
[8]  
Geuss R., 1981, IDEA CRITICAL THEORY
[9]  
Gilbert Margaret., 2006, THEORY POLITICAL OBL, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199274959.001.0001
[10]  
Gilbert Margaret, 2018, RIGHTS AND DEMANDS