Utility of DSM-5 section III personality traits in differentiating borderline personality disorder from comparison groups

被引:33
作者
Bach, B. [1 ]
Sellbom, M. [2 ]
Bo, S. [1 ]
Simonsen, E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Psychiat Res Unit, Faelledvej 6, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
PID-5; Borderline Personality Disorder; DSM-5 Section III; Personality Traits; Criteria; PREVALENCE; INVENTORY; MODEL; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.04.006
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a highly prevalent diagnosis in mental health care and includes a heterogeneous constellation of symptoms. As the field of personality disorder (PD) research moves to emphasize dimensional traits in its operationalization, it is important to determine how the alternative DSM-5 Section III personality trait dimensions differentiates such features in BPD patients versus comparison groups. To date, no study has attempted such validation. Method: The current study examined the utility of the DSM-5 trait dimensions in differentiating patients with the categorical DSM-IV/5 diagnosis of BPD (n = 101) from systematically matched samples of other PD patients (n = 101) and healthy controls (n = 101). This was investigated using one-way ANOVA and multinomial logistic regression analyses. Results: Results indicated that Emotional Lability, Risk Taking, and Suspiciousness uniquely differentiated BPD patients from other PD patients, whereas Emotional Lability, Depressivity, and Suspiciousness uniquely differentiated BPD patients from healthy controls. Conclusion: Emotional Lability is in particular a key BPD feature of the proposed Section III model, whereas Suspiciousness also augments essential BPD features. Provided that these findings are replicated cross-culturally in forthcoming research, a more parsimonious traits operationalization of BPD features is warranted. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 27
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current Status and Future Directions [J].
Al-Dajani, Nadia ;
Gralnick, Tara M. ;
Bagby, R. Michael .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 98 (01) :62-81
[2]   A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures [J].
Anderson, Jaime ;
Snider, Stephen ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Krueger, Robert ;
Hopwood, Christopher .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2014, 216 (03) :363-372
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Personality Inventory DSM-5 (PID-5) SelfReport Form
[4]  
[Anonymous], CAN J PSYCH IN PRESS
[5]  
[Anonymous], PERSONAL DI IN PRESS
[6]  
[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[7]  
Bo S, 2016, J PERS DISORD, V30, P112, DOI 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_187
[8]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[9]   Components of Emotion Dysregulation in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review [J].
Carpenter, Ryan W. ;
Trull, Timothy J. .
CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2013, 15 (01)
[10]  
Carter MJ, 2014, THER RECREAT J, V48, P275