Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence

被引:23
作者
Price, Danielle Markle [1 ]
Noblett, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ob Gyn, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
Cough stress test; Pad test; Stress urinary incontinence; Urodynamics; URODYNAMIC EVALUATION; WOMEN; HISTORY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-011-1602-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis The 24-h pad test and cough stress test are commonly used to assess stress urinary incontinence; however, no comparative data are available. The cough stress test is superior to the 24-h pad test. Methods Women with predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms underwent a cough stress test, a 24-h pad test, and urodynamic testing. Results Complete data were available on 55 women. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the stress test occurred in 89% of women (k=0.51). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 90%, 80%, 98%, and 44%. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the pad test occurred in 60% of women (k=0.08). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 60%, 60%, 94%, and 13%. Agreement between the cough stress test and the pad test occurred in 67% (k=0.26). Conclusions The cough stress test is more reliable than the pad test for documentation of stress urinary incontinence.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 433
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence [J].
Albo, Michael ;
Wruck, Lisa ;
Baker, Jan ;
Brubaker, Linda ;
Chai, Toby ;
Dandreo, Kimberly J. ;
Diokno, Ananias ;
Goode, Patricia ;
Kraus, Stephen ;
Kusek, John W. ;
Lemack, Gary ;
Lowder, Jerry ;
Steers, William .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (05) :1810-1814
[2]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[3]   Comparison of Air-Charged and Water-Filled Urodynamic Pressure Measurement Catheters [J].
Cooper, M. A. ;
Fletter, P. C. ;
Zaszczurynski, P. J. ;
Damaser, M. S. .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 (03) :329-334
[4]   Do Women With Pure Stress Urinary Incontinence Need Urodynamics? [J].
Digesu, G. Alessandro ;
Hendricken, Caroline ;
Fernando, Ruwan ;
Khullar, Vik .
UROLOGY, 2009, 74 (02) :278-281
[5]   Noninvasive outcome measures of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: A multicenter study of micturition diary and pad tests [J].
Groutz, A ;
Blaivas, JG ;
Chaikin, DC ;
Resnick, NM ;
Engleman, K ;
Anzalone, D ;
Bryzinski, B ;
Wein, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (03) :698-701
[6]   An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Haylen, Bernard T. ;
de Ridder, Dirk ;
Freeman, Robert M. ;
Swift, Steven E. ;
Berghmans, Bary ;
Lee, Joseph ;
Monga, Ash ;
Petri, Eckhard ;
Rizk, Diaa E. ;
Sand, Peter K. ;
Schaer, Gabriel N. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (01) :5-26
[7]   The repeatability of the 24-hour pad test [J].
Karantanis, E ;
Allen, W ;
Stevermuer, TL ;
Simons, AM ;
O'Sullivan, R ;
Moore, KH .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 16 (01) :63-68
[8]   The 24-hour pad test in continent women and men: normal values and cyclical alterations [J].
Karantanis, E ;
O'Sullivan, R ;
Moore, KH .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 (06) :567-571
[9]   VALUE OF THE PATIENTS CASE-HISTORY IN DIAGNOSING URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN GENERAL-PRACTICE [J].
LAGROJANSSEN, ALM ;
DEBRUYNE, FMJ ;
VANWEEL, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 67 (06) :569-572
[10]   24-HOUR HOME PAD WEIGHING TEST VERSUS 1-HOUR WARD TEST IN THE ASSESSMENT OF MILD STRESS-INCONTINENCE [J].
LOSE, G ;
JORGENSEN, L ;
THUNEDBORG, P .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 68 (03) :211-215