Predicting drug response of tumors from integrated genomic profiles by deep neural networks

被引:153
作者
Chiu, Yu-Chiao [1 ]
Chen, Hung-I Harry [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Tinghe [2 ]
Zhang, Songyao [2 ,3 ]
Gorthi, Aparna [1 ]
Wang, Li-Ju [1 ]
Huang, Yufei [2 ,4 ]
Chen, Yidong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Greehey Childrens Canc Res Inst, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
[3] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Automat, Minist Educ, Lab Informat Fus Technol, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
Deep neural networks; Pharmacogenomics; Drug response prediction; Cancer cell line encyclopedia; Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer; The Cancer Genome Atlas; CANCER; CELLS; DNA; SENSITIVITY; INHIBITION; RESISTANCE; P53;
D O I
10.1186/s12920-018-0460-9
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe study of high-throughput genomic profiles from a pharmacogenomics viewpoint has provided unprecedented insights into the oncogenic features modulating drug response. A recent study screened for the response of a thousand human cancer cell lines to a wide collection of anti-cancer drugs and illuminated the link between cellular genotypes and vulnerability. However, due to essential differences between cell lines and tumors, to date the translation into predicting drug response in tumors remains challenging. Recently, advances in deep learning have revolutionized bioinformatics and introduced new techniques to the integration of genomic data. Its application on pharmacogenomics may fill the gap between genomics and drug response and improve the prediction of drug response in tumors.ResultsWe proposed a deep learning model to predict drug response (DeepDR) based on mutation and expression profiles of a cancer cell or a tumor. The model contains three deep neural networks (DNNs), i) a mutation encoder pre-trained using a large pan-cancer dataset(The Cancer Genome Atlas; TCGA) to abstract core representations of high-dimension mutation data, ii) a pre-trained expression encoder, and iii) a drug response predictor network integrating the first two subnetworks. Given a pair of mutation and expression profiles, the model predicts IC50 values of 265 drugs. We trained and tested the model on a dataset of 622 cancer cell lines and achieved an overall prediction performance of mean squared error at 1.96 (log-scale IC50 values). The performance was superior in prediction error or stability than two classical methods (linear regression and support vector machine) and four analog DNN models of DeepDR, including DNNs built without TCGA pre-training, partly replaced by principal components, and built on individual types of input data. We then applied the model to predict drug response of 9059 tumors of 33 cancer types. Using per-cancer and pan-cancer settings, the model predicted both known, including EGFR inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer and tamoxifen in ER+ breast cancer, and novel drug targets, such as vinorelbine for TTN-mutated tumors. The comprehensive analysis further revealed the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance to a chemotherapeutic drug docetaxel in a pan-cancer setting and the anti-cancer potential of a novel agent, CX-5461, in treating gliomas and hematopoietic malignancies.ConclusionsHere we present, as far as we know, the first DNN model to translate pharmacogenomics features identified from in vitro drug screening to predict the response of tumors. The results covered both well-studied and novel mechanisms of drug resistance and drug targets. Our model and findings improve the prediction of drug response and the identification of novel therapeutic options.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting the impact of single nucleotide variants on splicing via sequence-based deep neural networks and genomic features
    Naito, Tatsuhiko
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2019, 40 (09) : 1261 - 1269
  • [22] Predicting performances in business processes using deep neural networks
    Park, Gyunam
    Song, Minseok
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2020, 129
  • [23] Predicting and explaining nonlinear material response using deep physically guided neural networks with internal variables
    Ayensa-Jimenez, Jacobo
    Orera-Echeverria, Javier
    Doblare, Manuel
    MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF SOLIDS, 2025, 30 (02) : 573 - 598
  • [24] Image response regression via deep neural networks
    Zhang, Daiwei
    Li, Lexin
    Sripada, Chandra
    Kang, Jian
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2024, 85 (05) : 1589 - 1614
  • [25] Predicting Kerr Soliton Combs in Microresonators via Deep Neural Networks
    Tan, Teng
    Peng, Cheng
    Yuan, Zhongye
    Xie, Xu
    Liu, Hao
    Xie, Zhenda
    Huang, Shu-Wei
    Rao, Yunjiang
    Yao, Baicheng
    JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 38 (23) : 6591 - 6599
  • [26] DRPreter: Interpretable Anticancer Drug Response Prediction Using Knowledge-Guided Graph Neural Networks and Transformer
    Shin, Jihye
    Piao, Yinhua
    Bang, Dongmin
    Kim, Sun
    Jo, Kyuri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (22)
  • [27] Predicting Positions and Velocities of Surrounding Vehicles using Deep Neural Networks
    Ilic, Velibor
    Kukolj, Dragan
    Marijan, Malisa
    Teslic, Nikola
    2019 ZOOMING INNOVATION IN CONSUMER TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (ZINC), 2019, : 126 - 129
  • [28] Visualizing complex feature interactions and feature sharing in genomic deep neural networks
    Ge Liu
    Haoyang Zeng
    David K. Gifford
    BMC Bioinformatics, 20
  • [29] Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation
    Jia, Peilin
    Hu, Ruifeng
    Pei, Guangsheng
    Dai, Yulin
    Wang, Yin-Ying
    Zhao, Zhongming
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [30] Single-Cell Techniques and Deep Learning in Predicting Drug Response
    Wu, Zhenyu
    Lawrence, Patrick J.
    Ma, Anjun
    Zhu, Jian
    Xu, Dong
    Ma, Qin
    TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 41 (12) : 1050 - 1065