Integrating preferences into health status assessment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: The ALS Utility Index

被引:16
作者
Beusterien, K
Leigh, N
Jackson, C
Miller, R
Mayo, K
Revicki, D
机构
[1] MEDTAP Int Inc, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Kings Res Ctr, London, England
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
来源
AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND OTHER MOTOR NEURON DISORDERS | 2005年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
ALS; preferences; multi-attribute utility;
D O I
10.1080/14660820410021339
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We developed a preference-based measure, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Utility Index (ALSUI), allowing computation of US population-based utility weights for the wide range of health states observed among ALS patients. A multi-attribute utility approach was used. An ALS Health State Classification System was developed comprising the following attributes with different severity levels: Speech and Swallowing (A1); Eating, Dressing, and Bathing (A2); Leg Function (A3); and Respiratory Function (A4). An internet-based survey was administered to a random sample of the US population to assess preferences for ALS health states based on this system using visual analog scale ( VAS) and standard gamble (SG) questions. Using the VAS and SG data from 1374 individuals in the general population, utility functions were computed that corresponded to each severity level within A1, A2, A3, and A4. ALSUI scores for a given patient are computed by inputting his corresponding utility functions into the following multiplicative formula: ALSUI score=1.06x(A1xA2xA3xA4) -0.06 on a scale where 0.0 reflects death and 1.0 reflects healthy. This study provides a useful tool for classifying ALS patients and determining a general public-based utility score for ALS health states.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 176
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Cost effectiveness of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I therapy in patients with ALS [J].
Ackerman, SJ ;
Sullivan, EM ;
Beusterien, KM ;
Natter, HM ;
Gelinas, DF ;
Patrick, DL .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 15 (02) :179-195
[2]   The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function [J].
Cedarbaum, JM ;
Stambler, N ;
Malta, E ;
Fuller, C ;
Hilt, D ;
Thurmond, B ;
Nakanishi, A .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 169 (1-2) :13-21
[3]   An Internet-based utility assessment of breast hypertrophy [J].
Chang, WT ;
Collins, ED ;
Kerrigan, CL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (02) :370-377
[4]   A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of α-tocopherol (vitamin E) in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [J].
Desnuelle, C ;
Dib, M ;
Garrel, C ;
Favier, A .
AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS, 2001, 2 (01) :9-18
[5]   Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies [J].
Drummond, M .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (05) :344-349
[6]   Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system [J].
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W ;
Torrance, GW ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Zhu, ZL ;
DePauw, S ;
Denton, M ;
Boyle, M .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) :113-128
[7]   Health Utilities Index Mark 3 - Evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey [J].
Grootendorst, P ;
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (03) :290-299
[8]   Patients' health-related quality of life and utilities associated with different stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [J].
Kiebert, GM ;
Green, C ;
Murphy, C ;
Mitchell, JD ;
O'Brien, M ;
Burrell, A ;
Leigh, PN .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 191 (1-2) :87-93
[9]   ONSET, NATURAL-HISTORY AND OUTCOME IN IDIOPATHIC ADULT MOTOR-NEURON DISEASE [J].
NORRIS, F ;
SHEPHERD, R ;
DENYS, E ;
MUKAI, KUE ;
ELIAS, L ;
HOLDEN, D ;
NORRIS, H .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 118 (01) :48-55
[10]   MEASURING PREFERENCES FOR HEALTH STATES WORSE THAN DEATH [J].
PATRICK, DL ;
STARKS, HE ;
CAIN, KC ;
UHLMANN, RF ;
PEARLMAN, RA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 14 (01) :9-18