Reshaping nanobodies for affinity purification on protein a

被引:6
|
作者
Crauwels, Maxine [1 ,2 ]
Van Vaerenbergh, Nele [1 ]
Kulaya, Neeme Benedict [1 ]
Vincke, Cecile [1 ]
D'Huyvetter, Matthias [2 ]
Devoogdt, Nick [2 ]
Muyldermans, Serge [1 ]
Xavier, Catarina [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Lab Cellular & Mol Immunol, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, In Vivo Cellular & Mol Imaging Lab ICMI, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Nanobody; Protein A; Affinity chromatography; DOMAIN ANTIBODIES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; PHASE-I; THERAPY; FRAGMENTS; BINDING; EXPRESSION; GENERATION; RECEPTORS; SEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nbt.2020.01.005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Nanobodies (Nbs) are 15 kDa recombinant, single-domain, antigen-specific fragments derived from heavy-chain only antibodies (HCAbs) occurring naturally in species of Camelidae. The beneficial properties of Nbs make them suitable tracers for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Whereas Nbs with a terminal hexa-histidine tag (His-tag) are easily purified via immobilized metal affinity chromatography, previous studies revealed a negative impact of the His-tag on the biodistribution of Nb-based tracers. Thus, it is important to develop alternative purification methods for Nbs without a His-tag. Protein A (SpA), a surface protein of Staphylococcus aureus, binds the Fc-region of IgG molecules and also to a lesser extent human heavy chain family-3 variable (VH) regions. Nbs also belong to this VH family, although many fail to be recognized by SpA. Here it is demonstrated that non-SpA binding Nbs can be mutagenized for purification by SpA affinity chromatography and that these Nb variants retain their thermostability and antigen affinity, while biodistribution remains unaffected.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 28
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Affinity chromatography system for parallel purification of recombinant protein samples
    Gottstein, C
    Forde, R
    PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 2002, 15 (10): : 775 - 777
  • [32] New trends and affinity tag designs for recombinant protein purification
    Wood, David W.
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 26 : 54 - 61
  • [33] A convenient method for affinity purification of maltose binding protein fusions
    Srinivasan, U
    Bell, JA
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1998, 62 (03) : 163 - 167
  • [34] CHiC, a new tandem affinity tag for the protein purification toolbox
    Stamsas, Gro Anita
    Havarstein, Leiv Sigve
    Straume, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 92 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [35] A Comparison Between Cell, Protein and Peptide-Based Approaches for Selection of Nanobodies Against CD44 from a Synthetic Library
    Kavousipour, Soudabeh
    Mokarram, Pooneh
    Gargari, Seyed Latif Mousavi
    Mostafavi-Pour, Zohreh
    Barazesh, Mehdi
    Ramezani, Amin
    Ashktorab, Hassan
    Mohammadi, Shiva
    Ghavami, Saeid
    PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS, 2018, 25 (06) : 580 - 588
  • [36] Thiacarbocyanine as ligand in dye-affinity chromatography for protein purification
    Boto, R. E. F.
    Almeida, P.
    Queiroz, J. A.
    BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2008, 22 (03) : 278 - 288
  • [37] Recombinant protein purification using complementary peptides as affinity tags
    Martinez-Caron, Maria C.
    Targovnik, Alexandra M.
    Urtasun, Nicolas
    Cascone, Osvaldo
    Miranda, Maria V.
    Camperi, Silvia A.
    NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 29 (02) : 206 - 210
  • [38] Aptamer affinity chromatography: combinatorial chemistry applied to protein purification
    Romig, TS
    Bell, C
    Drolet, DW
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 1999, 731 (02): : 275 - 284
  • [39] Oriented immobilization of nanobodies using SpyCatcher/SpyTag significantly enhances the capacity of affinity chromatography
    Zhang, Yuxiang
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Luyao
    Liu, Yongdong
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2024, 1730
  • [40] Protein purification by aminosquarylium cyanine dye-affinity chromatography
    Silva, M. S.
    Graca, V. C.
    Reis, L. V.
    Santos, P. F.
    Almeida, P.
    Queiroz, J. A.
    Sousa, F.
    BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2013, 27 (12) : 1671 - 1679