Clinical characteristics do not reliably identify non-adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension

被引:2
作者
Groenland, Eline H. [1 ]
Dasgupta, Indranil [2 ]
Visseren, Frank L. J. [1 ]
van der Elst, Kim C. M. [3 ]
Lorde, Nathan [4 ]
Lawson, Alexander J. [4 ]
Bots, Michiel L. [5 ]
Spiering, Wilko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Vasc Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Warwick, Heartlands Hosp, Birmingham & Warwick Med Sch, Renal Unit, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Clin Pharm, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Birmingham, Dept Clin Chem Immunol & Toxicol, Heartlands Hosp, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Hypertension; antihypertensive agents; medication adherence; chemical adherence testing; liquid chromatography; diagnostic test; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE MEDICATION; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; REFILL ADHERENCE; PREDICTION MODEL; DRUG ADHERENCE; PERFORMANCE; RISK; BIAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1080/08037051.2022.2104215
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Purpose Chemical adherence testing is a reliable method to assess adherence to antihypertensive drugs. However, it is expensive and has limited availability in clinical practice. To reduce the number and costs of chemical adherence tests, we aimed to develop and validate a clinical screening tool to identify patients with a low probability of non-adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Materials and Methods In 495 patients with uncontrolled hypertension referred to the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), the Netherlands, a penalised logistic regression model including seven pre-specified easy-to-measure clinical variables was derived to estimate the probability of non-adherence. Non-adherence was defined as not detecting at least one of the prescribed antihypertensive drugs in plasma or urine. Model performance and test characteristics were evaluated in 240 patients with uncontrolled hypertension referred to the Heartlands Hospital, United Kingdom. Results Prevalence of non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs was 19% in the UMCU and 44% in the Heartlands Hospital population. After recalibration of the model's intercept, predicted probabilities agreed well with observed frequencies. The c-statistic of the model was 0.63 (95%CI 0.53-0.72). Predicted probability cut-off values of 15%-22.5% prevented testing in 5%-15% of the patients, carrying sensitivities between 97% (64-100) and 90% (80-95), and negative predictive values between 74% (10-99) and 70% (50-85). Conclusion The combination of seven clinical variables is not sufficient to reliably discriminate adherent from non-adherent individuals to safely reduce the number of chemical adherence tests. This emphasises the complex nature of non-adherence behaviour and thus the need for objective chemical adherence tests in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 186
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
    Alba, Ana Carolina
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Walsh, Michael
    Hanna, Steven
    Iorio, Alfonso
    Devereaux, P. J.
    McGinn, Thomas
    Guyatt, Gordon
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (14): : 1377 - 1384
  • [2] Evaluation of Adherence Should Become an Integral Part of Assessment of Patients With Apparently Treatment-Resistant Hypertension
    Berra, Elena
    Azizi, Michel
    Capron, Arnaud
    Hoieggen, Aud
    Rabbia, Franco
    Kjeldsen, Sverre E.
    Staessen, Jan A.
    Wallemacq, Pierre
    Persu, Alexandre
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2016, 68 (02) : 297 - +
  • [3] MULTIPLE IMPUTATION FOR NONRESPONSE IN SURVEYS - RUBIN,DB
    CAMPION, WM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (04) : 485 - 486
  • [4] Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study
    Collins, Gary S.
    Ogundimu, Emmanuel O.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (02) : 214 - 226
  • [5] Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.7326/M14-0698]
  • [6] Better compliance to antihypertensive medications reduces cardiovascular risk
    Corrao, Giovanni
    Parodi, Andrea
    Nicotra, Federica
    Zambon, Antonella
    Merlino, Luca
    Cesana, Giancarlo
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 29 (03) : 610 - 618
  • [7] ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guideline (EMERGE)
    De Geest, Sabina
    Zullig, Leah L.
    Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline
    Helmy, Remon
    Hughes, Dyfrig A.
    Wilson, Ira B.
    Vrijens, Bernard
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 169 (01) : 30 - +
  • [8] Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values
    Donders, A. Rogier T.
    van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
    Stijnen, Theo
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) : 1087 - 1091
  • [9] A Clinical Prediction Model of Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Patients in a Chinese Community Hospital in Beijing
    Gao, Wenjuan
    Liu, Hong
    Ge, Caiying
    Liu, Xinying
    Jia, Hongyan
    Wu, Hao
    Peng, Xiaoxia
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2020, 33 (11) : 1038 - 1046
  • [10] Risk Factors for Nonadherence to Antihypertensive Treatment
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Patel, Prashanth
    Strauch, Branislav
    Lai, Florence Y.
    Akbarov, Artur
    Maresova, Vera
    White, Christobelle M. J.
    Petrak, Ondrej
    Gulsin, Gaurav S.
    Patel, Veena
    Rosa, Jan
    Cole, Richard
    Zelinka, Tomas
    Holaj, Robert
    Kinnell, Angela
    Smith, Paul R.
    Thompson, John R.
    Squire, Iain
    Widimsky, Jiri, Jr.
    Samani, Nilesh J.
    Williams, Bryan
    Tomaszewski, Maciej
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2017, 69 (06) : 1113 - 1120