The Simple View of Reading Redux: Vocabulary Knowledge and the Independent Components Hypothesis

被引:247
作者
Tunmer, William E. [1 ]
Chapman, James W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
关键词
reading difficulties; simple view of reading; vocabulary knowledge; WORD-RECOGNITION; COMPREHENSION; SKILLS; LANGUAGE; CHILDREN; ABILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0022219411432685
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This study investigated the hypothesis that the contributions of oral language comprehension (C) and word recognition (D) to reading comprehension (R) in the simple view of reading (SVR) are not independent because a component of C (vocabulary knowledge) directly contributes to the variance in D. Three analysis procedures (hierarchical regression analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling) were used to analyze data obtained from a sample (N = 122) of 7-year-old students who were administered tests of vocabulary knowledge, nonword reading, word recognition (two standardized tests), and parallel forms of listening and reading comprehension. Results from the regression analysis indicated that vocabulary made a contribution to R beyond that made by word recognition and listening comprehension; results from the exploratory factor analysis showed that two factors (Decoding and Linguistic Comprehension) were extracted, with vocabulary and listening comprehension loading highly on the Linguistic Comprehension factor; and results from structural equation modeling revealed that the latent construct, C, influenced R not only directly but also indirectly through the latent construct, D.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 466
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Diagnosis and Treatment of Reading Disabilities Based on the Component Model of Reading An Alternative to the Discrepancy Model of LD [J].
Aaron, P. G. ;
Joshi, R. Malatesha ;
Gooden, Regina ;
Bentum, Kwesi E. .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2008, 41 (01) :67-84
[2]   Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults [J].
Braze, David ;
Tabor, Whitney ;
Shankweiler, Donald P. ;
Mencl, W. Einar .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2007, 40 (03) :226-243
[3]  
Clay M., 2005, LITERACY LESSONS DES
[4]   Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured [J].
Cutting, Laurie E. ;
Scarborough, Hollis S. .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2006, 10 (03) :277-299
[5]  
Dunn D. M., 2019, Peabody picture vocabulary test, V5th
[6]  
Ehri LC, 2005, BL HBK DEV PSYCHOL, P135, DOI 10.1002/9780470757642.ch8
[7]  
Gilmore A., 1981, The Burt Word Reading Test-New Zealand Revision
[8]  
Gough PB., 1986, Remedial and Special Education, V7, P6, DOI [10.1177/074193258600700104, DOI 10.1177/074193258600700104]
[9]   THE SIMPLE VIEW OF READING [J].
HOOVER, WA ;
GOUGH, PB .
READING AND WRITING, 1990, 2 (02) :127-160
[10]   Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension [J].
Keenan, Janice M. ;
Betjemann, Rebecca S. ;
Olson, Richard K. .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2008, 12 (03) :281-300