Hydrologically Based Environmental Flow Methods Applied to Rivers in the Maritime Provinces (Canada)

被引:39
作者
Caissie, J. [1 ]
Caissie, D. [2 ]
El-Jabi, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Moncton, Moncton, NB E1A 3E9, Canada
[2] Fisheries & Oceans, Moncton, NB E1C 9B6, Canada
关键词
environmental flow; instream flow; low flow; flow duration; baseflow; STANDARDS; REGIME; WATER;
D O I
10.1002/rra.2772
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The demand for water withdrawal continues to increase worldwide. These water withdrawals from rivers can affect fish habitat and aquatic life. As such, environmental flow assessment methods are used in order to protect rivers against excessive water withdrawals. The concept of environmental flow relates to the quantity of water required in rivers to sustain an acceptable level of living conditions for aquatic biota at various phases of their development. For many agencies, environmental flow methods are essential in environmental impact assessments and in the protection of important fisheries resources. The present study deals with the evaluation of hydrologically based environmental flow methods within the Maritime Province of Canada. In total, six hydrologically based environmental flow methods were compared using data from 52 hydrometric stations across the region. Some methods provided adequate environmental flow protection (e.g. 25% mean annual flow and Q(50) flow duration method); however, other methods did not provide adequate flow protection (e.g. Q(90) flow duration method and 7Q10 and 7Q2 low-flow frequency). The 70% Q(50) method provided adequate flow protection only under good baseflow conditions and should be applied with extreme caution. The present study shows the importance of the hydrologic flow regime, particularly as it pertains to the baseflow component, as a significant determinant in the level of instream flow protection. (c) 2014 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. River Research and Applications (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 662
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Defining environmental river flow requirements - a review [J].
Acreman, M ;
Dunbar, MJ .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (05) :861-876
[2]   Developing environmental standards for abstractions from UK rivers to implement the EU Water Framework Directive [J].
Acreman, Mike ;
Dunbar, Michael ;
Hannaford, Jamie ;
Mountford, Owen ;
Wood, Paul ;
Holmes, Nigel ;
Cowx, Ian ;
Noble, Richard ;
Extence, Chris ;
Aldrick, John ;
King, Jackie ;
Black, Andrew ;
Crookall, David .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2008, 53 (06) :1105-1120
[3]  
Annear T., 2004, Instream flows for riverine resource stewardship
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, 12 US FISH WILDL SER
[5]  
[Anonymous], RIVERS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, DEP INTERIOR NATL BI
[7]   Modelling approaches for relating effects of change in river flow to populations of Atlantic salmon and brown trout [J].
Armstrong, J. D. ;
Nislow, K. H. .
FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) :527-536
[8]  
Beecher H.A., 1990, Rivers, V1, P97
[9]  
Belzile L., 1997, Methode ecohydrologique de determination des debits reserves pour la protection dans les habitats du poisson dans les rivieres du Quebec
[10]   The Processes, Patterns and Impacts of Low Flows Across Canada [J].
Burn, Donald H. ;
Buttle, James M. ;
Caissie, Daniel ;
MacCulloch, Greg ;
Spence, Chris ;
Stahl, Kerstin .
CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES JOURNAL, 2008, 33 (02) :107-123