A retrospective evaluation of patient acceptance of computed tomography colonography ("virtual colonoscopy") in comparison with conventional colonoscopy in an average risk screening population

被引:16
作者
Juchems, MS [1 ]
Ehmann, J [1 ]
Brambs, HJ [1 ]
Aschoff, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ulm, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-89070 Ulm, Germany
关键词
CT colonography; colonoscopy; multi-detector row CT; patient acceptance;
D O I
10.1080/02841850500216277
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate patient acceptance of computed tomography (CT) colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy by means of a self-assessed questionnaire. Material and Methods: Four-hundred-and-one patients with valid address information from our patient collective were preselected. Patient acceptance was evaluated retrospectively using a self-assessed questionnaire. The patients underwent CT colonography in our institution using 4 x or 16 x multi-detector row (MDR) CT. Two-hundred-and-forty-six patients returned a completed questionnaire, 157 of these indicating that they had undergone both virtual and conventional colonoscopy. Results: One-hundred-and-twenty (76.4%) of the 157 patients would undergo another CT colonography if necessary, while only 14 patients would not. One-hundred-and-sixteen (73.9%) patients favored the actual examination procedure of CT colonography (P<0.0001), while only 6.4% preferred the conventional method. Preparation prior to CT colonography was experienced as more convenient than preparation prior to conventional colonoscopy (52.2% versus 14%). Conclusion: CT colonography was preferred in terms of both preparation and the actual procedure itself.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 670
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RADIOLOGY
[2]   Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results [J].
Bielen, D ;
Thomeer, M ;
Vanbeckevoort, D ;
Kiss, G ;
Maes, F ;
Marchal, G ;
Rutgeerts, P .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :453-458
[3]   Virtual endoscopy using CT scan [J].
Brambs, HJ ;
Juchems, MS .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2003, 12 (05) :207-216
[4]  
ELWOOD JM, 1995, CANCER DETECT PREV, V19, P337
[5]   A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Nunes, DP ;
Schroy, PC ;
Barish, MA ;
Clarke, PD ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) :1496-1503
[6]  
Gryspeerdt S, 2002, JBR-BTR, V85, P289
[7]   Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): Blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Laghi, A ;
Iannaccone, R ;
Carbone, I ;
Catalano, C ;
Panebianco, V ;
Di Giulio, E ;
Schillaci, A ;
Passariello, R .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (06) :441-446
[8]   Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography [J].
Laghi, A ;
Iannaccone, R ;
Carbone, I ;
Catalano, C ;
Di Giulio, E ;
Schillaci, A ;
Passariello, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 183 (02) :124-131
[9]   Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: Initial results-polyp detection and patient acceptance [J].
Lefere, PA ;
Gryspeerdt, SS ;
Dewyspelaere, J ;
Baekelandt, M ;
Van Holsbeeck, BG .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (02) :393-403
[10]   Colorectal neoplasms: Prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection [J].
Macari, M ;
Bini, EJ ;
Xue, XN ;
Milano, A ;
Katz, SS ;
Resnick, D ;
Chandarana, H ;
Krinsky, G ;
Klingenbeck, K ;
Marshall, CH ;
Megibow, AJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (02) :383-392